REOPENED 12025
WebArchive fails to save background images in <tr> tags 
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12025
Summary WebArchive fails to save background images in <tr> tags
David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
Reported 2006-12-28 21:08:00 PST
When a .webarchive file is saved, any background images in <tr> tags are not serialized to the output file.
Attachments
WebArchive layout test (as patch) (4.97 KB, patch)
2006-12-28 21:11 PST, David Kilzer (:ddkilzer) 		no flags
DetailsFormatted DiffDiff
View All Add attachment proposed patch, testcase, etc.
David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
Comment 1 2006-12-28 21:11:01 PST
Created attachment 12098 [details] WebArchive layout test (as patch) WebArchive layout test formatted as a patch.
Brady Eidson
Comment 2 2008-04-02 23:17:04 PDT
This one is going to be very easy to fix with the new archive setup in WebCore However, I have a question... I find no evidence that <tr>s can officially have background images, standards-wise. Therefore, I'm guessing this is some Mozilla or IE compatibility thing we added. Looking at the HTMLTablePart code, it appears *any* table part can have a background image. Is that correct? If so, shouldn't this patch make sure all table parts get their background images saved?
David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
Comment 3 2008-04-03 13:25:55 PDT
(In reply to comment #2) > This one is going to be very easy to fix with the new archive setup in WebCore > However, I have a question... I find no evidence that <tr>s can officially > have background images, standards-wise. Therefore, I'm guessing this is some > Mozilla or IE compatibility thing we added. > > Looking at the HTMLTablePart code, it appears *any* table part can have a > background image. Is that correct? > > If so, shouldn't this patch make sure all table parts get their background > images saved? At the time, I think I only tested <tr> tags. If HTMLTablePart supports background images on all parts, then we should archive them.
Brady Eidson
Comment 4 2008-04-03 15:00:44 PDT
A few further points of discussion: -The background attribute isn't officially supported for anything but <body>, I think, so its weird and nonstandard that we support it for any table parts -The background attribute for HTMLTablePart is fed directly into inline style information and handled in a very CSSey fashion. -Therefore, while we could support archiving the resource pointed to by the background attribute for table parts specifically, there's a broader-reaching problem of archiving resources referred to by all inline style. Not saying I don't plan to fix this specific bug, but... the more accurate we get with esoteric subresources (like background images of <tr>s), the more apparent it is that we're ignoring a large class of subresources
Brian Burg
Comment 5 2014-12-14 19:59:28 PST
WAR export isn't supported these days.
Brian Burg
Comment 6 2014-12-14 20:01:11 PST
Oops, thought this was filed as an inspector bug.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.