WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Search+
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
119737
[sh4] DFG_JIT implementation for sh4 architecture
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119737
Summary
[sh4] DFG_JIT implementation for sh4 architecture
Julien Brianceau
Reported
2013-08-13 03:17:19 PDT
I'll submit a DFG_JIT implementation proposal for sh4 architecture soon.
Attachments
DFG_JIT implementation for sh4 architecture
(86.56 KB, patch)
2013-08-13 04:52 PDT
,
Julien Brianceau
jbriance
: commit-queue-
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
DFG_JIT implementation for sh4 architecture
(87.62 KB, patch)
2013-08-13 09:39 PDT
,
Julien Brianceau
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
DFG_JIT implementation for sh4 architecture (after split)
(37.74 KB, patch)
2013-08-14 02:14 PDT
,
Julien Brianceau
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(2)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Julien Brianceau
Comment 1
2013-08-13 04:52:21 PDT
Created
attachment 208618
[details]
DFG_JIT implementation for sh4 architecture I've tested this patch on my sh4 board using
r153882
and I didn't see regressions when running - Tools/Scripts/run-javascriptcore-tests - Tools/Scripts/run-fast-jsc - SunSpider 1.0 SunSpider 1.0 results on
r153882
without this patch: ============================================ RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals) -------------------------------------------- Total: 13166.3ms +/- 0.2% -------------------------------------------- 3d: 2706.3ms +/- 0.5% cube: 837.8ms +/- 0.6% morph: 539.2ms +/- 0.7% raytrace: 1329.3ms +/- 0.7% access: 1905.7ms +/- 0.1% binary-trees: 114.2ms +/- 2.7% fannkuch: 1148.7ms +/- 0.4% nbody: 455.2ms +/- 1.0% nsieve: 187.7ms +/- 0.3% bitops: 1031.2ms +/- 0.4% 3bit-bits-in-byte: 78.2ms +/- 0.5% bits-in-byte: 111.2ms +/- 0.4% bitwise-and: 196.0ms +/- 0.0% nsieve-bits: 645.8ms +/- 0.6% controlflow: 74.0ms +/- 0.0% recursive: 74.0ms +/- 0.0% crypto: 1165.7ms +/- 1.3% aes: 666.2ms +/- 1.9% md5: 317.5ms +/- 1.1% sha1: 182.0ms +/- 2.0% date: 2085.0ms +/- 1.1% format-tofte: 925.7ms +/- 1.2% format-xparb: 1159.3ms +/- 1.3% math: 850.2ms +/- 1.1% cordic: 248.8ms +/- 3.8% partial-sums: 343.8ms +/- 2.7% spectral-norm: 257.5ms +/- 1.2% regexp: 531.0ms +/- 0.8% dna: 531.0ms +/- 0.8% string: 2817.3ms +/- 0.5% base64: 218.2ms +/- 0.5% fasta: 446.3ms +/- 3.2% tagcloud: 560.0ms +/- 1.1% unpack-code: 1255.2ms +/- 1.0% validate-input: 337.7ms +/- 2.2% SunSpider 1.0 results on
r153882
with this patch: ============================================ RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals) -------------------------------------------- Total: 10122.6ms +/- 0.2% -------------------------------------------- 3d: 2440.8ms +/- 0.2% cube: 899.0ms +/- 0.3% morph: 278.5ms +/- 0.6% raytrace: 1263.3ms +/- 0.2% access: 882.0ms +/- 0.3% binary-trees: 106.5ms +/- 1.6% fannkuch: 289.3ms +/- 0.5% nbody: 335.9ms +/- 0.7% nsieve: 150.3ms +/- 0.7% bitops: 335.5ms +/- 0.6% 3bit-bits-in-byte: 29.2ms +/- 1.0% bits-in-byte: 74.6ms +/- 1.8% bitwise-and: 79.2ms +/- 0.4% nsieve-bits: 152.5ms +/- 0.9% controlflow: 96.1ms +/- 0.2% recursive: 96.1ms +/- 0.2% crypto: 886.4ms +/- 0.3% aes: 464.9ms +/- 0.6% md5: 251.0ms +/- 0.7% sha1: 170.5ms +/- 0.7% date: 1512.6ms +/- 0.4% format-tofte: 780.6ms +/- 0.7% format-xparb: 732.0ms +/- 0.7% math: 589.3ms +/- 0.4% cordic: 148.5ms +/- 0.3% partial-sums: 314.9ms +/- 0.6% spectral-norm: 125.9ms +/- 0.2% regexp: 529.1ms +/- 0.4% dna: 529.1ms +/- 0.4% string: 2850.8ms +/- 0.7% base64: 189.2ms +/- 0.9% fasta: 402.9ms +/- 0.9% tagcloud: 541.1ms +/- 0.6% unpack-code: 1323.1ms +/- 1.0% validate-input: 394.5ms +/- 1.5%
Julien Brianceau
Comment 2
2013-08-13 06:28:05 PDT
Comment on
attachment 208618
[details]
DFG_JIT implementation for sh4 architecture I cq- because I just saw that this patch introduces a regression (crash) in v8-v4 test suite. However, I'd still be happy to get feedbacks on this patch, especially the "SH4_32BIT_DUMMY_ARG" part introduced in DFGSpeculativeJIT.h.
Julien Brianceau
Comment 3
2013-08-13 09:39:58 PDT
Created
attachment 208642
[details]
DFG_JIT implementation for sh4 architecture I've tested this patch on my sh4 board using
r153999
and I didn't see regressions when running - Tools/Scripts/run-javascriptcore-tests - Tools/Scripts/run-fast-jsc - SunSpider 1.0 - v8-v4 test suite v8-v4 test suite results on
r153999
without this patch: ============================================ RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals) -------------------------------------------- Total: 74696.0ms +/- 11.7% -------------------------------------------- v8: 74696.0ms +/- 11.7% crypto: 13296.7ms +/- 1.4% deltablue: 21649.7ms +/- 17.6% earley-boyer: 6108.0ms +/- 7.4% raytrace: 7092.7ms +/- 7.3% regexp: 6166.3ms +/- 1.2% richards: 15396.0ms +/- 43.9% splay: 4986.7ms +/- 6.6% v8-v4 test suite results on
r153999
with this patch: ============================================ RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals) -------------------------------------------- Total: 36705.7ms +/- 0.7% -------------------------------------------- v8: 36705.7ms +/- 0.7% crypto: 4592.0ms +/- 0.5% deltablue: 7425.7ms +/- 1.6% earley-boyer: 4113.3ms +/- 0.2% raytrace: 5562.7ms +/- 1.1% regexp: 7486.7ms +/- 0.1% richards: 4316.7ms +/- 1.4% splay: 3208.7ms +/- 9.5%
Oliver Hunt
Comment 4
2013-08-13 09:40:09 PDT
Comment on
attachment 208618
[details]
DFG_JIT implementation for sh4 architecture Separate out the llint changes into a separate patch (it will jus take it easier to be sure a regression was not introduced by those vs. the dfg. Similarly there's a lot of assembler changes that look like they should be safe on there own (separate tom this patch)
Julien Brianceau
Comment 5
2013-08-13 09:59:11 PDT
Comment on
attachment 208642
[details]
DFG_JIT implementation for sh4 architecture (In reply to
comment #4
)
> Separate out the llint changes into a separate patch (it will jus take it easier to be sure a regression was not introduced by those vs. the dfg. Similarly there's a lot of assembler changes that look like they should be safe on there own (separate tom this patch)
Thanks. So I'm going to separate this patch in 3 parts: LLINT, MacroAssembler not related to the DFG then the DFG.
Julien Brianceau
Comment 6
2013-08-13 10:16:26 PDT
LLINT part:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119755
Julien Brianceau
Comment 7
2013-08-13 10:54:55 PDT
Baseline JIT part:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119758
Julien Brianceau
Comment 8
2013-08-14 02:14:01 PDT
Created
attachment 208707
[details]
DFG_JIT implementation for sh4 architecture (after split)
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 9
2013-08-14 09:24:11 PDT
Comment on
attachment 208707
[details]
DFG_JIT implementation for sh4 architecture (after split) Rejecting
attachment 208707
[details]
from commit-queue. Failed to run "['/Volumes/Data/EWS/WebKit/Tools/Scripts/webkit-patch', '--status-host=webkit-queues.appspot.com', '--bot-id=webkit-cq-03', 'build', '--no-clean', '--no-update', '--build-style=release', '--port=mac']" exit_code: 2 cwd: /Volumes/Data/EWS/WebKit Last 500 characters of output: ilure) Failed to run "['Tools/Scripts/build-webkit', '--release']" exit_code: 65 Process.sb make: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... make: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. Command /bin/sh failed with exit code 2 ** BUILD FAILED ** The following build commands failed: PhaseScriptExecution "Generate Derived Sources" "/Volumes/Data/EWS/WebKit/WebKitBuild/WebKit2.build/Release/Derived Sources.build/Script-C0CE72841247E66800BC0EC4.sh" (1 failure) Full output:
http://webkit-queues.appspot.com/results/1464096
Julien Brianceau
Comment 10
2013-08-14 09:27:47 PDT
Comment on
attachment 208707
[details]
DFG_JIT implementation for sh4 architecture (after split) Mac bot looks sick today :-/
Allan Sandfeld Jensen
Comment 11
2013-08-14 09:50:03 PDT
Comment on
attachment 208707
[details]
DFG_JIT implementation for sh4 architecture (after split) Clearing flags on attachment: 208707 Committed
r154052
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/154052
>
Allan Sandfeld Jensen
Comment 12
2013-08-14 09:50:10 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug