WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED WONTFIX
119721
Node::lazyReattach should avoid doing lots of work if already set to lazyAttach
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119721
Summary
Node::lazyReattach should avoid doing lots of work if already set to lazyAttach
Ryosuke Niwa
Reported
2013-08-12 20:47:41 PDT
Consider merging
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/blink/+/56066be33d1372c11c3f2f97af0fa34a663f16fe
In
r155380
I originally observed a 25-30% improvement in speed for ShadowDOM/LargeDistributionWithLayout:Runs, but the final bug I fixed in that patch before uploading turned that into a 30% performance regression. The reason for this is that we now correctly lazyAttach all distributed nodes when doing lazyAttach on an InsertionPoint while before we were incorrectly skipping this work leading to bugs. It turns out the biggest issue with the fix is that we now end up calling lazyReattach repeatedly on the same nodes as we go through the distribution process in the ContentDistributor. To avoid this we can make Node::lazyReattach smart enough to skip doing the detach() and lazyAttach() if the node is already set to lazyAttach. This restores the 25-30% improvement on ShadowDOM/LargeDistributionWithLayout:Runs and adds a 3-6% improvement on all other ShadowDOM/* perf tests. It should also improve our performance when doing large multi level reprojections since we'll no longer do the detach/lazyAttach work for each node as we reproject them down through the tree. Unfortunately when researching this I also realized that the LargeDistributionWithLayout perf test doesn't actually perf test layout time at all. I'll deal with the perf test itself in a follow up patch.
Attachments
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Ahmad Saleem
Comment 1
2022-09-30 18:03:40 PDT
lazyAttach is not something in Webkit. So marking this as "RESOLVED WONTFIX".
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug