WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
118854
REGRESSION (
r132678
): Tests that use SSL or port 8080 time out when run using old-run-webkit-tests
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118854
Summary
REGRESSION (r132678): Tests that use SSL or port 8080 time out when run using...
Daniel Bates
Reported
2013-07-18 09:40:21 PDT
HTTP tests that use SSL (port 8443) and port 8080 time out when run using old-run-webkit-tests following <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/132678
> (
bug #98602
) because Apache no longer listens to ports 8443 (SSL) and 8080 by default. Instead we need to update Tools/Scripts/old-run-webkit-tests to explicitly tell Apache to listen on these ports.
Attachments
Patch
(2.64 KB, patch)
2013-07-18 09:47 PDT
,
Daniel Bates
ddkilzer
: review+
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Daniel Bates
Comment 1
2013-07-18 09:41:16 PDT
<
rdar://problem/14081339
>
Daniel Bates
Comment 2
2013-07-18 09:47:12 PDT
Created
attachment 206997
[details]
Patch
David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
Comment 3
2013-07-18 10:54:16 PDT
Comment on
attachment 206997
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=206997&action=review
r=me
> Tools/Scripts/old-run-webkit-tests:1586 > + "-c", "ErrorLog \"$absTestResultsDirectory/error_log.txt\""
Nit: I'm a fan of leaving the comma at the end in case more lines are added later, but it's not required to land this.
Daniel Bates
Comment 4
2013-07-18 11:22:03 PDT
(In reply to
comment #3
)
> [...] > > Tools/Scripts/old-run-webkit-tests:1586 > > + "-c", "ErrorLog \"$absTestResultsDirectory/error_log.txt\"" > > Nit: I'm a fan of leaving the comma at the end in case more lines are added later, but it's not required to land this.
Will add a comma to the end of this line before I land this patch.
Dirk Pranke
Comment 5
2013-07-18 11:24:17 PDT
I'm almost afraid to ask this, but who still cares about old-run-webkit-tests and why ? (This is not meant as a slanted question, I'm wondering if there are still reasons why people might want to run it instead of NRWT). AFAIK the only reason missing functionality still in ORWT at this point is maybe for the Qt Mac port ?
Daniel Bates
Comment 6
2013-07-18 11:24:49 PDT
Committed
r152852
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/152852
>
Daniel Bates
Comment 7
2013-07-18 11:26:29 PDT
(In reply to
comment #5
)
> I'm almost afraid to ask this, but who still cares about old-run-webkit-tests and why ? (This is not meant as a slanted question, I'm wondering if there are still reasons why people might want to run it instead of NRWT). > > AFAIK the only reason missing functionality still in ORWT at this point is maybe for the Qt Mac port ?
The iOS WebKit port uses old-run-webkit-tests at the time of writing.
Dirk Pranke
Comment 8
2013-07-18 11:39:19 PDT
(In reply to
comment #7
)
> The iOS WebKit port uses old-run-webkit-tests at the time of writing.
I see. Are there changes to support iOS in ORWT that aren't upstreamed? I don't see any mention of ios in either old-run-webkit-tests or webkitdirs.pm, so it's hard for me to say what would be needed to make NRWT work with it (though I would hope very little). Though this is clearly a separate issue ...
Daniel Bates
Comment 9
2013-07-18 12:05:35 PDT
(In reply to
comment #8
)
> (In reply to
comment #7
) > > The iOS WebKit port uses old-run-webkit-tests at the time of writing. > > I see. Are there changes to support iOS in ORWT that aren't upstreamed?
Yes. We're looking to either upstream these changes or, even better, switch to new-run-webkit-tests.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug