RESOLVED CONFIGURATION CHANGED 117908
CSS background-color differs for button when background image is specified by background-image/background
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117908
Summary CSS background-color differs for button when background image is specified b...
Santosh Mahto
Reported 2013-06-22 06:32:54 PDT
Created attachment 205246 [details] TestPage <button type="button" style="background: url("");"> Click Me1</button> <button type="button" style="background-image: url("");"> Click Me1</button> In both case the background color differs Since we are specifying only background image, the background color should not differ. In first case : background-color becomes initial value In second case : background-color becomes user agent specified value
Attachments
TestPage (329 bytes, text/html)
2013-06-22 06:32 PDT, Santosh Mahto
no flags
Patch (1.59 KB, patch)
2013-06-22 06:38 PDT, Santosh Mahto
beidson: review-
buildbot: commit-queue-
Archive of layout-test-results from webkit-ews-14 for mac-mountainlion-wk2 (506.23 KB, application/zip)
2013-06-22 07:15 PDT, Build Bot
no flags
Archive of layout-test-results from webkit-ews-03 for mac-mountainlion (608.16 KB, application/zip)
2013-06-22 07:42 PDT, Build Bot
no flags
Archive of layout-test-results from APPLE-EWS-3 for win-future (892.50 KB, application/zip)
2013-06-22 08:46 PDT, Build Bot
no flags
Archive of layout-test-results from APPLE-EWS-1 for win-future (892.47 KB, application/zip)
2013-06-22 09:58 PDT, Build Bot
no flags
Santosh Mahto
Comment 1 2013-06-22 06:38:23 PDT
Build Bot
Comment 2 2013-06-22 07:15:47 PDT
Comment on attachment 205247 [details] Patch Attachment 205247 [details] did not pass mac-wk2-ews (mac-wk2): Output: http://webkit-queues.appspot.com/results/960417 New failing tests: fast/forms/select-style.html
Build Bot
Comment 3 2013-06-22 07:15:48 PDT
Created attachment 205248 [details] Archive of layout-test-results from webkit-ews-14 for mac-mountainlion-wk2 The attached test failures were seen while running run-webkit-tests on the mac-wk2-ews. Bot: webkit-ews-14 Port: mac-mountainlion-wk2 Platform: Mac OS X 10.8.3
Build Bot
Comment 4 2013-06-22 07:42:54 PDT
Comment on attachment 205247 [details] Patch Attachment 205247 [details] did not pass mac-ews (mac): Output: http://webkit-queues.appspot.com/results/898881 New failing tests: fast/forms/select-style.html
Build Bot
Comment 5 2013-06-22 07:42:55 PDT
Created attachment 205249 [details] Archive of layout-test-results from webkit-ews-03 for mac-mountainlion The attached test failures were seen while running run-webkit-tests on the mac-ews. Bot: webkit-ews-03 Port: mac-mountainlion Platform: Mac OS X 10.8.3
Build Bot
Comment 6 2013-06-22 08:46:50 PDT
Comment on attachment 205247 [details] Patch Attachment 205247 [details] did not pass win-ews (win): Output: http://webkit-queues.appspot.com/results/966240 New failing tests: fast/forms/select-style.html
Build Bot
Comment 7 2013-06-22 08:46:52 PDT
Created attachment 205252 [details] Archive of layout-test-results from APPLE-EWS-3 for win-future The attached test failures were seen while running run-webkit-tests on the win-ews. Bot: APPLE-EWS-3 Port: win-future Platform: CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64-1.7.20-0.266-5-3-i686-32bit
Build Bot
Comment 8 2013-06-22 09:58:25 PDT
Comment on attachment 205247 [details] Patch Attachment 205247 [details] did not pass win-ews (win): Output: http://webkit-queues.appspot.com/results/918838 New failing tests: fast/forms/select-style.html
Build Bot
Comment 9 2013-06-22 09:58:27 PDT
Created attachment 205255 [details] Archive of layout-test-results from APPLE-EWS-1 for win-future The attached test failures were seen while running run-webkit-tests on the win-ews. Bot: APPLE-EWS-1 Port: win-future Platform: CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64-1.7.20-0.266-5-3-i686-32bit
Brady Eidson
Comment 10 2016-05-24 22:01:22 PDT
Comment on attachment 205247 [details] Patch Assuming that patches for review since 2013 are stale, r-
Brent Fulgham
Comment 11 2022-07-13 14:54:14 PDT
Safari, Chrome, and Firefox all agree on rendering for this test case. I don't believe there is any remaining compatibility issue.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.