Bug 115447 – Objective-C JavaScriptCore API should publicly support bridging to C

• Status: RESOLVED
• Resolution: FIXED
• Component: New Bugs

[Geoffrey Garen]

Objective-C JavaScriptCore API should publicly support bridging to C

[Geoffrey Garen]

Created attachment 200150 [details]
patch

[Mark Hahnenberg]

Comment on attachment 200150 [details]
patch

r=me

[Geoffrey Garen]

Committed r149401: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/149401>

[Timothy Hatcher]

Comment on attachment 200150 [details]
patch

View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=200150&action=review

> Source/JavaScriptCore/API/JSContext.h:124
> +// Creates a JSContext, wrapping its C API counterpart.
> ++ (JSContext *)contextWithJSGlobalContextRef:(JSGlobalContextRef)jsGlobalContextRef;
> +// Returns the C API counterpart wrapped by a JSContext.
> +- (JSGlobalContextRef)JSGlobalContextRef;

I'm not sure I like these method names. globalContextRef and contextWithGlobalContextRef: are more ObjC-like.

> Source/JavaScriptCore/API/JSContext.mm:52
> -- (JSGlobalContextRef)globalContextRef
> +- (JSGlobalContextRef)JSGlobalContextRef

Keep it like you had before!

> Source/JavaScriptCore/API/JSContext.mm:100
> -    return [JSValue valueWithValue:result inContext:self];
> +    return [JSValue valueWithJSValueRef:result inContext:self];

No…!

[Geoffrey Garen]

Here are the four functions we're considering in context:

@interface JSValue(JSValueRefSupport)
+ (JSValue *)valueWithJSValueRef:(JSValueRef)value inContext:(JSContext *)context;
- (JSValueRef)JSValueRef;
@end

@interface JSContext(JSContextRefSupport)
+ (JSContext *)contextWithJSGlobalContextRef:(JSGlobalContextRef)jsGlobalContextRef;
- (JSGlobalContextRef)JSGlobalContextRef;
@end

If we switched away from type names for functions, what would we name the up-conversion and down-conversion functions in JSValue?

[Mark Hahnenberg]

Comment on attachment 200150 [details]
patch

Clearing flags.

[Geoffrey Garen]

We discussed this in IRC and decided to keep the names as-is, since bare words "value" and "context" alone would probably be too terse, to the point of conflicting with things like NSValue and CGContext.