RESOLVED FIXED Bug 113568
g_slist_reverse() may not be required in webKitWebAudioSrcLoop
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113568
Summary g_slist_reverse() may not be required in webKitWebAudioSrcLoop
Praveen Jadhav
Reported 2013-03-29 04:35:15 PDT
webKitWebAudioSrcLoop() will be called continuously after AudioContext instance initialization which affects CPU load. Using decrement counter in for loop can reduce no. of instructions generated (when comparison is done with 0 in jump instruction). Also, g_slist_reverse() need not be used in that case.
Attachments
Patch (2.26 KB, patch)
2013-03-29 04:43 PDT, Praveen Jadhav
no flags
Patch (2.29 KB, patch)
2013-03-29 22:49 PDT, Praveen Jadhav
no flags
Patch (2.42 KB, patch)
2013-03-30 02:56 PDT, Praveen Jadhav
no flags
Praveen Jadhav
Comment 1 2013-03-29 04:43:05 PDT
Created attachment 195722 [details] Patch Basically, this change reduces the no. of instructions generated for webKitWebAudioSrcLoop.
Philippe Normand
Comment 2 2013-03-29 06:45:33 PDT
Comment on attachment 195722 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=195722&action=review Looks good but I'd like to test this patch before landing > Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:8 > + Decremental for loop logic implemented to avoid using g_slist_reverse(). This could be expanded a bit, explaining the performance gain. > Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:10 > + No new tests (OOPS!). You'd need to remove this line unless you state the patch is covered by existing webaudio tests.
Philippe Normand
Comment 3 2013-03-29 07:42:14 PDT
Ok I tested it, if you can improve the ChangeLog a bit it'd be great :)
Praveen Jadhav
Comment 4 2013-03-29 22:43:07 PDT
(In reply to comment #2) > (From update of attachment 195722 [details]) > View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=195722&action=review > > Looks good but I'd like to test this patch before landing > > > Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:8 > > + Decremental for loop logic implemented to avoid using g_slist_reverse(). > > This could be expanded a bit, explaining the performance gain. I tested with basic audiocontext with 2 destination channels only(No other nodes webaudio nodes are created). Calculated the time taken to execute webKitWebAudioSrcLoop() for 100000 iteration and the details are as below. Original code - 2.025230 micro seconds Original code + patch - 1.964759 micro seconds Its a small gain indeed, but a gain nevertheless. Given the frequency with which webKitWebAudioSrcLoop() is called, CPU load should decrease a bit. > > > Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:10 > > + No new tests (OOPS!). > > You'd need to remove this line unless you state the patch is covered by existing webaudio tests. I will update the patch shortly.
Praveen Jadhav
Comment 5 2013-03-29 22:49:25 PDT
Created attachment 195842 [details] Patch Patch updated as per review comments.
Praveen Jadhav
Comment 6 2013-03-29 23:22:16 PDT
(In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > (From update of attachment 195722 [details] [details]) > > View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=195722&action=review > > > > Looks good but I'd like to test this patch before landing > > > > > Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:8 > > > + Decremental for loop logic implemented to avoid using g_slist_reverse(). > > > > This could be expanded a bit, explaining the performance gain. > > I tested with basic audiocontext with 2 destination channels only(No other nodes webaudio nodes are created). Calculated the time taken to execute webKitWebAudioSrcLoop() for 100000 iteration and the details are as below. > > Original code - 2.025230 micro seconds > Original code + patch - 1.964759 micro seconds Correction: it is Original code - 2.025230 micro seconds per function execution Original code + patch - 1.964759 micro seconds per function execution > > Its a small gain indeed, but a gain nevertheless. Given the frequency with which webKitWebAudioSrcLoop() is called, CPU load should decrease a bit. > > > > > > Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:10 > > > + No new tests (OOPS!). > > > > You'd need to remove this line unless you state the patch is covered by existing webaudio tests. > > I will update the patch shortly.
Philippe Normand
Comment 7 2013-03-30 01:27:24 PDT
Ok it's good you made some measurements, can you put this explanation in the ChangeLog itself please?
Soo-Hyun Choi
Comment 8 2013-03-30 01:50:10 PDT
FYI - changed assignee to Praveen Jadhav.
Praveen Jadhav
Comment 9 2013-03-30 02:56:23 PDT
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 10 2013-03-30 03:39:35 PDT
Comment on attachment 195851 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 195851 Committed r147278: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/147278>
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 11 2013-03-30 03:39:39 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.