RESOLVED FIXED113283
Code duplication between HTTPParsers and HTTPValidation 
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113283
Summary Code duplication between HTTPParsers and HTTPValidation
Chris Dumez
Reported 2013-03-26 01:59:31 PDT
isRFC2616Token() from HTTPParsers and isValidHTTPToken() from HTTPValidation are doing exactly the same thing. We should refactor to avoid code duplication.
Attachments
Patch (21.93 KB, patch)
2013-03-26 02:22 PDT, Chris Dumez 		ap: review+
DetailsFormatted DiffDiff
Patch for landing (20.63 KB, patch)
2013-03-26 10:12 PDT, Chris Dumez 		no flags
DetailsFormatted DiffDiff
Show Obsolete (1) View All Add attachment proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Chris Dumez
Comment 1 2013-03-26 02:22:58 PDT
Created attachment 195038 [details] Patch
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 2 2013-03-26 09:48:48 PDT
Comment on attachment 195038 [details] Patch OK. We can consider splitting parsing and validation again if this file grows unwieldy. As far as naming goes, "isRFC2616Token" seems a little less descriptive to me than "isValidHTTPToken". The reason why I like the remaining name less is that one could wonder whether being an RFC2616 token is a built-in property of a String, like being atomic or being static. The other name reads a little more like a validity check that it is. But the difference is very small, and maybe it's just me thinking so.
Chris Dumez
Comment 3 2013-03-26 10:12:53 PDT
Created attachment 195105 [details] Patch for landing - Renamed to isValidHTTPToken().
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 4 2013-03-26 11:02:21 PDT
Comment on attachment 195105 [details] Patch for landing Clearing flags on attachment: 195105 Committed r146908: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/146908>
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 5 2013-03-26 11:02:27 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.