RESOLVED FIXED 111726
run-pert-tests should have a --test-runner-count option 
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111726
Summary run-pert-tests should have a --test-runner-count option
Glenn Adams
Reported 2013-03-07 07:04:02 PST
Given the recent addition of process_run_count argument to PerfTest(), which controls the number of samples taken when performing an individual test in a test set, the value of this argument should be exposed as a command line option, e.g., --sampleCount. Note that this is different from the --repeat argument proposed in bug 100030, which controls the number of times the entire test set is run. In particular, the number of samples (controlled by process_run_count) determine the number of data points used in statistical analysis; while different --repeat runs are not aggregated for statistical analysis in the shown results, i.e., are treated as distinct statistical result sets.
Attachments
Patch (12.77 KB, patch)
2013-03-07 19:09 PST, Glenn Adams 		no flags
DetailsFormatted DiffDiff
View All Add attachment proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 1 2013-03-07 10:27:35 PST
Let's stick to the same terminology: process run count.
Glenn Adams
Comment 2 2013-03-07 14:26:52 PST
(In reply to comment #1) > Let's stick to the same terminology: process run count. thanks, we agreed on IRC to change this to test-runner-count (test_runner_count), for option and argument names, since this corresponds to the number of test runner (DRT/WTR) instances invoked (in serial execution - not parallel)
Glenn Adams
Comment 3 2013-03-07 19:09:59 PST
Created attachment 192128 [details] Patch
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 4 2013-03-07 20:13:59 PST
Comment on attachment 192128 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 192128 Committed r145173: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/145173>
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 5 2013-03-07 20:14:03 PST
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.