Created attachment 190998 [details] test case According to CSS Transitions... >Name: transition-property >Value: none | <single-transition-property> [ ‘,’ <single-transition-property> ]* >(snip) ><single-transition-property> = all | <IDENT> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-transitions/#transition-property >Name: transition >Value: <single-transition> [ ‘,’ <single-transition> ]* >(snip) ><single-transition> = [ none | <single-transition-property> ] || <time> || <single-transition-timing-function> || <time> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-transitions/#transition On Windows 7 Home Premium SP1 64bit, Internet Explorer 10 and Firefox Nightly 22.0a1(buildID 20130301030909) corresponds to this. But Chromium 27.0.1427.0 (185534) doesn't accept "all, all" in transition-property property and transition shorthand property. This bug seems not to be fixed in Bug 110074 unfortunately. Therefore I reports it as a Bug with a test case.
I'm wondering if all, all makes any sense. Tab what do you think?
(In reply to comment #1) > I'm wondering if all, all makes any sense. > > Tab what do you think? Yes, it should accept both. It's not very *useful* to do so, but once we switch from 'all' being a magic value to 'all' just being a normal shorthand property, we'll want to allow it to be duplicated.
(In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > I'm wondering if all, all makes any sense. > > > > Tab what do you think? > > Yes, it should accept both. It's not very *useful* to do so, but once we switch from 'all' being a magic value to 'all' just being a normal shorthand property, we'll want to allow it to be duplicated. Ok then I'll fix it.
Created attachment 191022 [details] Patch
Comment on attachment 191022 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 191022 Committed r144644: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/144644>
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
I confirmed that this bug is fixed on Chromium 27.0.1431.0 (186272). Thanks!