RESOLVED FIXED 107384
[GTK] Update expected failures for IndexedDB tests 
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107384
Summary [GTK] Update expected failures for IndexedDB tests
Michael Pruett
Reported 2013-01-19 16:45:31 PST
Several IndexedDB tests depend upon functionality that is not implemented in WebKit, DumpRenderTree, or WebKitTestRunner. These tests should be skipped until the corresponding features have been implemented.
Attachments
Patch (4.22 KB, patch)
2013-01-19 16:46 PST, Michael Pruett 		no flags
DetailsFormatted DiffDiff
Patch (4.22 KB, patch)
2013-01-19 16:49 PST, Michael Pruett 		no flags
DetailsFormatted DiffDiff
Show Obsolete (1) View All Add attachment proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Michael Pruett
Comment 1 2013-01-19 16:46:14 PST
Created attachment 183643 [details] Patch
Michael Pruett
Comment 2 2013-01-19 16:49:58 PST
Created attachment 183644 [details] Patch
Martin Robinson
Comment 3 2013-01-19 17:05:48 PST
Comment on attachment 183644 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=183644&action=review > LayoutTests/platform/gtk/TestExpectations:458 > +# Workers do not share an IDB factory with the main page > +webkit.org/b/82776 storage/indexeddb/dont-commit-on-blocked.html > +webkit.org/b/82776 storage/indexeddb/pending-version-change-stuck.html > +webkit.org/b/82776 storage/indexeddb/pending-version-change-stuck-works-with-terminate.html > +webkit.org/b/82776 storage/indexeddb/pending-version-change-on-exit.html > + > +# IndexedDB quota is not implemented for non-Chromium ports > +webkit.org/b/106507 storage/indexeddb/database-quota.html > + > +# Deactivation of new transactions is not handled on workers for JSC ports > +webkit.org/b/106732 storage/indexeddb/pending-activity-workers.html > +webkit.org/b/106732 storage/indexeddb/transaction-complete-workers.html > + These should probably stay at the bottom of the file, since the first section is for missing major features (things that aren't considered bugs) and platform-dependent features. I'm a little curious why you removed the classification of the failure too. It's useful because it tells us if the test starts failing in a different way.
Michael Catanzaro
Comment 4 2015-05-03 14:20:49 PDT
Is this bug obsolete?
Carlos Garcia Campos
Comment 5 2015-05-25 01:17:05 PDT
Yes, this is obsolete now. TestExpectations were updated in r84850.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.