WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED INVALID
106800
[V8] Make an Isolate parameter mandatory in SerializedScriptValue methods
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106800
Summary
[V8] Make an Isolate parameter mandatory in SerializedScriptValue methods
Kentaro Hara
Reported
2013-01-14 09:00:10 PST
SerializedScriptValue methods are used by both V8 bindings and WebCore. So they should support both an Isolate-version method and an non-Isolate version method. There are two ways to accomplish that: [1] Use an optional Isolate parameter. [2] Implement two versions and delegate the non-Isolate version method to the Isolate version method. I would prefer the approach [2], because I'd like to statically make sure that we never passe a 0 Isolate. If we take the approach [1], we need to insert ASSERT(isolate) here and there.
Attachments
Patch
(9.19 KB, patch)
2013-01-14 09:01 PST
,
Kentaro Hara
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Kentaro Hara
Comment 1
2013-01-14 09:01:45 PST
Created
attachment 182588
[details]
Patch
Adam Barth
Comment 2
2013-01-14 09:28:09 PST
Comment on
attachment 182588
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=182588&action=review
Ok, but we should be able to remove the non-isolate version of many of these methods once we've updated all the callers. (Notice that the JSC versions pass an ExecState.)
> Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:10 > + SerializedScriptValue methods are used by both V8 bindings > + and WebCore. So they should support both an Isolate-version > + method and an non-Isolate version method.
The JSC version needs an ExecState, which plays a similar roll to the isolate in the V8 version.
> Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:20 > + make sure that we never passe a 0 Isolate. If we take the approach
passe -> pass
Kentaro Hara
Comment 3
2013-01-15 05:52:43 PST
Comment on
attachment 182588
[details]
Patch Landed in
r139735
.
Kentaro Hara
Comment 4
2013-01-15 06:05:40 PST
(In reply to
comment #2
)
> Ok, but we should be able to remove the non-isolate version of many of these methods once we've updated all the callers. (Notice that the JSC versions pass an ExecState.)
Yes. Given that these methods can be called from WebCore with a ScriptState parameter, one way to solve the problem would be to implement a mechanism to retrieve an Isolate from a ScriptState. JSC already implemented it (i.e. toJS(toRef(ScriptState*) gives us an ExecState).
Adam Barth
Comment 5
2013-01-15 12:22:12 PST
Yeah, I think we're going to want to keep the Isolate in the ScriptState for a bunch of other cases as well.
Brian Burg
Comment 6
2014-12-16 00:48:15 PST
Closing some V8-related work items.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug