Bug 106588 - [GTK][WK1] Skip IndexedDB layout tests for GTK WK1
Summary: [GTK][WK1] Skip IndexedDB layout tests for GTK WK1
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: WebKit
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Tools / Tests (show other bugs)
Version: 528+ (Nightly build)
Hardware: Unspecified Unspecified
: P2 Normal
Assignee: Nobody
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2013-01-10 11:44 PST by Michael Pruett
Modified: 2013-03-01 02:49 PST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Patch (1.45 KB, patch)
2013-01-10 11:47 PST, Michael Pruett 		no flags Details | Formatted Diff | Diff
Patch (1.47 KB, patch)
2013-01-10 11:51 PST, Michael Pruett 		no flags Details | Formatted Diff | Diff
Show Obsolete (2) View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Michael Pruett 2013-01-10 11:44:18 PST 
IndexedDB will not be implemented for GTK WK1.
Comment 1 Michael Pruett 2013-01-10 11:47:19 PST 
Created attachment 182180 [details]
Patch
Comment 2 WebKit Review Bot 2013-01-10 11:48:37 PST 
Attachment 182180 [details] did not pass style-queue:

Failed to run "['Tools/Scripts/check-webkit-style', '--diff-files', u'LayoutTests/ChangeLog', u'LayoutTests/plat..." exit_code: 1
LayoutTests/ChangeLog:1:  ChangeLog entry has no bug number  [changelog/bugnumber] [5]
Total errors found: 1 in 2 files


If any of these errors are false positives, please file a bug against check-webkit-style.
Comment 3 Michael Pruett 2013-01-10 11:51:30 PST 
Created attachment 182182 [details]
Patch
Comment 4 Martin Robinson 2013-01-18 10:22:29 PST 
We'll run these tests on WebKit1 as well now that we've avoided adding new API for the database path: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107299
Comment 5 Eric Seidel (no email) 2013-03-01 02:49:42 PST 
Comment on attachment 182182 [details]
Patch

Cleared review? from attachment 182182 [details] so that this bug does not appear in http://webkit.org/pending-review.  If you would like this patch reviewed, please attach it to a new bug (or re-open this bug before marking it for review again).