WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
105878
Add supplementability for WebContext
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105878
Summary
Add supplementability for WebContext
Sam Weinig
Reported
2012-12-30 18:45:39 PST
Add supplementability for WebContext
Attachments
Patch
(21.01 KB, patch)
2012-12-30 18:46 PST
,
Sam Weinig
mitz: review+
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Sam Weinig
Comment 1
2012-12-30 18:46:39 PST
Created
attachment 180962
[details]
Patch
mitz
Comment 2
2012-12-31 11:47:21 PST
Comment on
attachment 180962
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=180962&action=review
> Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/API/C/WKContext.cpp:39 > +
!
Sam Weinig
Comment 3
2012-12-31 11:54:39 PST
Committed
r138599
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/138599
>
Adam Barth
Comment 4
2013-01-02 00:40:16 PST
Comment on
attachment 180962
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=180962&action=review
I was curious about the approach, and I noticed one nit below. Please feel free to ignore my nitpicking. :)
> Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/WebContextSupplement.h:36 > + WebContextSupplement(WebContext* context)
One-argument constructors should use the "explicit" keyword (unless you really wan the implicit conversions, which seems unlikely here)
Sam Weinig
Comment 5
2013-01-02 09:59:07 PST
(In reply to
comment #4
)
> (From update of
attachment 180962
[details]
) > View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=180962&action=review
> > I was curious about the approach, and I noticed one nit below. Please feel free to ignore my nitpicking. :)
I just trying to break things up into to existing abstractions right now, not much approach going on.
> > > Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/WebContextSupplement.h:36 > > + WebContextSupplement(WebContext* context) > > One-argument constructors should use the "explicit" keyword (unless you really wan the implicit conversions, which seems unlikely here)
Indeed, will fix.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug