Bug 105669 - instance-of-immediates.js : the word "passing" is spelled incorrectly
Summary: instance-of-immediates.js : the word "passing" is spelled incorrectly
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: WebKit
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Tools / Tests (show other bugs)
Version: 528+ (Nightly build)
Hardware: Unspecified Unspecified
: P2 Normal
Assignee: Nobody
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-12-21 16:19 PST by Stuart Eichert
Modified: 2012-12-28 00:02 PST (History)
7 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments
patch (4.11 KB, patch)
2012-12-21 16:46 PST, Stuart Eichert
no flags Details | Formatted Diff | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Stuart Eichert 2012-12-21 16:19:11 PST
The comments in instance-of-immediates.js describe what is being passed to the test function, testSet.  The word "passsing" should be spelled "passing".
Comment 1 Stuart Eichert 2012-12-21 16:46:56 PST
Created attachment 180574 [details]
patch
Comment 2 Michelangelo De Simone 2012-12-22 03:51:07 PST
LGTM, I guess it would make total sense to ask for r? and cq?.
Let's see who can take care of this.
Comment 3 Julien Chaffraix 2012-12-22 09:07:32 PST
(In reply to comment #2)
> LGTM, I guess it would make total sense to ask for r? and cq?.

The change makes sense. Stuart are you posting this patch for review?

BTW we really welcome spelling fixes but we usually prefer such massaging to occur as part of some other change (this is our policy for fixing style violations and extra white spaces). The rationale is to avoid unneeded churn when blaming the files.
Comment 4 Stuart Eichert 2012-12-22 12:24:56 PST
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > LGTM, I guess it would make total sense to ask for r? and cq?.
> 
> The change makes sense. Stuart are you posting this patch for review?
> 
> BTW we really welcome spelling fixes but we usually prefer such massaging to occur as part of some other change (this is our policy for fixing style violations and extra white spaces). The rationale is to avoid unneeded churn when blaming the files.

Yes, I am posting this patch for review.  Thanks for the note about fixing spelling, style, etc. during the course of some other change.  I'll try to do that in the future.
Comment 5 Julien Chaffraix 2012-12-27 23:59:07 PST
Comment on attachment 180574 [details]
patch

Great, patches for review should have the r? flag set in the future.
Comment 6 WebKit Review Bot 2012-12-28 00:02:11 PST
Comment on attachment 180574 [details]
patch

Clearing flags on attachment: 180574

Committed r138524: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/138524>
Comment 7 WebKit Review Bot 2012-12-28 00:02:15 PST
All reviewed patches have been landed.  Closing bug.