RESOLVED FIXED 105426
Add tests to cover what transition-timing-function accepts for cubic-bezier values. 
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105426
Summary Add tests to cover what transition-timing-function accepts for cubic-bezier v...
Alexis Menard (darktears)
Reported 2012-12-19 06:05:45 PST
As stated by http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-transitions/#transition-timing-function cubic-bezier Specifies a cubic-bezier curve. The four values specify points P1 and P2 of the curve as (x1, y1, x2, y2). Both x values must be in the range [0, 1] or the definition is invalid. The y values can exceed this range. WebKit accepts "cubic-bezier(3, 0.1, 4, 1)" and does not reject the value as it should.
Attachments
Patch (14.82 KB, patch)
2012-12-21 04:53 PST, Alexis Menard (darktears) 		no flags
DetailsFormatted DiffDiff
Patch (17.01 KB, patch)
2012-12-21 05:47 PST, Alexis Menard (darktears) 		no flags
DetailsFormatted DiffDiff
Patch (11.50 KB, patch)
2013-01-03 10:45 PST, Alexis Menard (darktears) 		no flags
DetailsFormatted DiffDiff
Show Obsolete (2) View All Add attachment proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Alexis Menard (darktears)
Comment 1 2012-12-21 04:53:00 PST
Created attachment 180501 [details] Patch
Alexis Menard (darktears)
Comment 2 2012-12-21 05:47:27 PST
Created attachment 180506 [details] Patch
Peter Beverloo
Comment 3 2013-01-02 09:11:49 PST
I removed the clamping in r96276 following discussion on www-style: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Apr/0489.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jun/0254.html It seems like the specification still hasn't been updated, even though the last ED isn't that old. Dean, do you have any plans to update it, or have new concerns come up? http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-transitions/#transition-timing-function-property
Alexis Menard (darktears)
Comment 4 2013-01-02 12:31:23 PST
(In reply to comment #3) > I removed the clamping in r96276 following discussion on www-style: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Apr/0489.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jun/0254.html > > It seems like the specification still hasn't been updated, even though the last ED isn't that old. Dean, do you have any plans to update it, or have new concerns come up? > > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-transitions/#transition-timing-function-property Well if Dean confirms then I just need to update the tests to make sure we cover the behaviour correctly.
Simon Fraser (smfr)
Comment 5 2013-01-02 21:06:29 PST
Yes, we should allow Y values to be > 1.
Alexis Menard (darktears)
Comment 6 2013-01-03 10:45:11 PST
Created attachment 181189 [details] Patch
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 7 2013-01-03 11:07:06 PST
Comment on attachment 181189 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 181189 Committed r138721: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/138721>
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 8 2013-01-03 11:07:10 PST
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Dean Jackson
Comment 9 2013-01-08 12:32:08 PST
Oops. We should clamp the X values though. It was my fault in the other bug: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45761 The spec is correct AFAICT.
Dean Jackson
Comment 10 2013-01-08 12:32:35 PST
i.e. cubic-bezier(3, 0.1, 4, 1) should end up as cubic-bezier(1, 0.1, 1, 1)
Alexis Menard (darktears)
Comment 11 2013-01-09 03:53:14 PST
Fixed by https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106369. Closing the bug.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.