RESOLVED FIXED 105307
2 fast/filesystem test cases ask for more space than the size they request when creating the file system
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105307
Summary 2 fast/filesystem test cases ask for more space than the size they request wh...
Lyon Chen
Reported 2012-12-18 08:21:43 PST
Following two test cases ask for more space than they request when making the request to open a file system: LayoutTests/fast/filesystem/file-writer-abort-continue.html LayoutTests/fast/filesystem/op-get-metadata.html For the first test case, in file fast/filesystem/resources/file-writer-abort-continue.js, following code is called to create a WebFileSystem with 2M size: setupAndRunTest(2*1024*1024, ...), but then in one of the test, a length of 2200000 is requested as shown below, with blobSize defined as 1100000. verifyLength : blobSize * 2, // Add in leftovers from previous method. For the second test case, in file fast/filesystem/resources/op-tests-helper.js, following code is called to create a WebFileSystem with 100 bytes size: webkitRequestFileSystem(TEMPORARY, 100, fileSystemCallback, errorCallback); But then in one of the test file in fast/filesystem/resources/op-get-metadata.js, an 100 bytes file is requested, after a file with 10 bytes size is created. {fullPath:'/file3', size:100}, Right now the size used in requestFileSystem() is not enforced, but for platform want to enforce this limit, these 2 tests will fail because the space over usage.
Attachments
patch for update these 2 test cases (2.11 KB, patch)
2012-12-18 08:42 PST, Lyon Chen
no flags
updated patch for 105307. (2.60 KB, patch)
2012-12-19 13:06 PST, Lyon Chen
no flags
Lyon Chen
Comment 1 2012-12-18 08:42:35 PST
Created attachment 179952 [details] patch for update these 2 test cases
Lyon Chen
Comment 2 2012-12-18 08:47:01 PST
Add original author of these 2 test cases: Eric, Kinuko Yasuda
Eric U.
Comment 3 2012-12-18 14:42:27 PST
Comment on attachment 179952 [details] patch for update these 2 test cases View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=179952&action=review > LayoutTests/fast/filesystem/resources/file-writer-abort-continue.js:-177 > -setupAndRunTest(2*1024*1024, 'file-writer-abort', Why not key this directly off blobSize, e.g. make it "blobSize * 2 + someWiggleRoomForOverhead"? Different implementations will have different overhead costs [between zero and e.g. an amount used for e.g. storing path names], but it seems safer to use blobSize than to put in an undocumented number that will go stale or just be wrong. Speaking from experience, obviously, as I wrote this bug ;'>.
Lyon Chen
Comment 4 2012-12-19 10:07:30 PST
(In reply to comment #3) > (From update of attachment 179952 [details]) > View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=179952&action=review > > > LayoutTests/fast/filesystem/resources/file-writer-abort-continue.js:-177 > > -setupAndRunTest(2*1024*1024, 'file-writer-abort', > > Why not key this directly off blobSize, e.g. make it "blobSize * 2 + someWiggleRoomForOverhead"? Different implementations will have different overhead costs [between zero and e.g. an amount used for e.g. storing path names], but it seems safer to use blobSize than to put in an undocumented number that will go stale or just be wrong. Speaking from experience, obviously, as I wrote this bug ;'>. Thanks Eric. But the problem is then how to decide the size of the overhead? Does using a percentage, like 8/512 (8 bytes per 512 byte block), make sense to you?
Eric U.
Comment 5 2012-12-19 11:09:33 PST
> Thanks Eric. But the problem is then how to decide the size of the overhead? Does using a percentage, like 8/512 (8 bytes per 512 byte block), make sense to you? You can see what chromium does in UsageForPath at http://code.google.com/searchframe#OAMlx_jo-ck/src/webkit/fileapi/obfuscated_file_util.cc&exact_package=chromium&q=UsageForPath We charge overhead per file plus per character of name. Whatever you put in will certainly be approximate, but anything's better than just a random number, and if you make your fudge factor large, it won't break for a long time. And then whoever's got a problem with it can fix it.
Lyon Chen
Comment 6 2012-12-19 13:06:20 PST
Created attachment 180213 [details] updated patch for 105307. Updates based on Eric's comments.
Eric U.
Comment 7 2012-12-19 13:14:55 PST
Comment on attachment 180213 [details] updated patch for 105307. View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=180213&action=review > LayoutTests/fast/filesystem/resources/file-writer-abort-continue.js:23 > +var fileSystemSize = blobSize * 2 + fileSystemOverhead; That ought to be plenty; thanks for the fix.
Lyon Chen
Comment 8 2012-12-19 13:29:21 PST
(In reply to comment #7) > (From update of attachment 180213 [details]) > View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=180213&action=review > > > LayoutTests/fast/filesystem/resources/file-writer-abort-continue.js:23 > > +var fileSystemSize = blobSize * 2 + fileSystemOverhead; > > That ought to be plenty; thanks for the fix. And thanks for the comment and info, Eric.
Yong Li
Comment 9 2012-12-20 08:16:20 PST
Comment on attachment 180213 [details] updated patch for 105307. r+ according to Eric's comments. Thanks Eric
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 10 2012-12-20 08:23:44 PST
Comment on attachment 180213 [details] updated patch for 105307. Clearing flags on attachment: 180213 Committed r138257: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/138257>
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 11 2012-12-20 08:23:48 PST
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.