RESOLVED FIXED 105238
[chromium] Add the GL_CHROMIUM_lose_context to WebGraphicsContext3D
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105238
Summary [chromium] Add the GL_CHROMIUM_lose_context to WebGraphicsContext3D
Dana Jansens
Reported 2012-12-17 18:22:02 PST
[chromium] Add the GL_CHROMIUM_lose_context to WebGraphicsContext3D
Attachments
Patch (1.47 KB, patch)
2012-12-17 18:22 PST, Dana Jansens
no flags
Patch for landing (1.51 KB, patch)
2012-12-17 18:27 PST, Dana Jansens
no flags
Dana Jansens
Comment 1 2012-12-17 18:22:17 PST
James Robinson
Comment 2 2012-12-17 18:23:59 PST
Comment on attachment 179846 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=179846&action=review > Source/Platform/chromium/public/WebGraphicsContext3D.h:244 > + virtual void loseContext() { } can we call it lostContextCHROMIUM() to be consistent with the naming for other extensions?
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 3 2012-12-17 18:24:04 PST
Please wait for approval from abarth@webkit.org, dglazkov@chromium.org, fishd@chromium.org, jamesr@chromium.org or tkent@chromium.org before submitting, as this patch contains changes to the Chromium public API. See also https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/ChromiumWebKitAPI.
Dana Jansens
Comment 4 2012-12-17 18:27:57 PST
Created attachment 179847 [details] Patch for landing
Dana Jansens
Comment 5 2012-12-17 18:28:07 PST
(In reply to comment #2) > (From update of attachment 179846 [details]) > View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=179846&action=review > > > Source/Platform/chromium/public/WebGraphicsContext3D.h:244 > > + virtual void loseContext() { } > > can we call it lostContextCHROMIUM() to be consistent with the naming for other extensions? Oops, definitely.
Dana Jansens
Comment 6 2012-12-17 19:06:53 PST
Comment on attachment 179847 [details] Patch for landing Maybe these lost context tests are useless now.
Dana Jansens
Comment 7 2012-12-17 19:32:06 PST
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.