WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED WONTFIX
104926
[EFL] Add more accessibility test and expected results
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104926
Summary
[EFL] Add more accessibility test and expected results
Mateusz Leszko
Reported
2012-12-13 09:34:42 PST
Created
attachment 179288
[details]
Added some accessiblity tests Added some accessiblity tests from: platform/gtk/accessibility platform/mac/accessibility platform/chromium/accessibility Due to turning on accessiblity in EFL.
Attachments
Added some accessiblity tests
(54.00 KB, patch)
2012-12-13 09:34 PST
,
Mateusz Leszko
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Added some accessiblity tests
(54.02 KB, patch)
2012-12-13 09:49 PST
,
Mateusz Leszko
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(1)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 1
2012-12-13 09:39:19 PST
Attachment 179288
[details]
did not pass style-queue: Failed to run "['Tools/Scripts/check-webkit-style', '--diff-files', u'LayoutTests/ChangeLog', u'LayoutTests/plat..." exit_code: 1 LayoutTests/ChangeLog:1: ChangeLog entry has no bug number [changelog/bugnumber] [5] Total errors found: 1 in 40 files If any of these errors are false positives, please file a bug against check-webkit-style.
Mateusz Leszko
Comment 2
2012-12-13 09:49:06 PST
Created
attachment 179290
[details]
Added some accessiblity tests added bug number
Alejandro Piñeiro
Comment 3
2012-12-13 11:24:21 PST
I noticed your patch and had a couple of questions: * Given that the EFL and GTK port now share a single accessibility implementation, does it make sense to duplicate tests from the GTK port? Wouldn't it make more sense to share the accessibility tests? (i.e. renaming gtk platform to atk platform). * In the same way, with this patch you are copying some mac-chromium specific platform tests to EFL. If you got those tests working, it would suggest that those tests work for all of our platforms and should be moved to the shared test set. Am I missing something that makes your proposed solution the preferred one? In general, our goal is to get as many shared tests as possible and this seems to be moving in the opposite direction.
Mateusz Leszko
Comment 4
2012-12-14 08:01:13 PST
You might be interested in sharing tests bug
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104662
Gyuyoung Kim
Comment 5
2012-12-14 21:32:34 PST
(In reply to
comment #4
)
> You might be interested in sharing tests bug
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104662
Please link this bug to
Bug 104662
Gyuyoung Kim
Comment 6
2013-01-16 02:04:28 PST
Comment on
attachment 179290
[details]
Added some accessiblity tests View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=179290&action=review
> LayoutTests/ChangeLog:12 > + due to turning on accessiblity in EFL.
I think we have to move common test case files to common place(e.g. LayoutTests/accessibility). Are you thinking about it ?
Mateusz Leszko
Comment 7
2013-01-16 02:19:01 PST
(In reply to
comment #6
)
> > I think we have to move common test case files to common place(e.g. LayoutTests/accessibility). Are you thinking about it ?
Yes, I will try to add those tests to LayoutTests/accessibility/atk. I'll put a patch soon.
Mateusz Leszko
Comment 8
2013-02-06 04:05:20 PST
There is a discussion and problem what solution choose. This one or the one from
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104662
Anders Carlsson
Comment 9
2014-02-05 11:02:13 PST
Comment on
attachment 179290
[details]
Added some accessiblity tests Clearing review flag on patches from before 2014. If this patch is still relevant, please reset the r? flag.
Michael Catanzaro
Comment 10
2017-03-11 10:52:46 PST
Closing this bug because the EFL port has been removed from trunk. If you feel this bug applies to a different upstream WebKit port and was closed in error, please either update the title and reopen the bug, or leave a comment to request this.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug