RESOLVED FIXED Bug 104485
Flexbox should ignore firstLine pseudo element.
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104485
Summary Flexbox should ignore firstLine pseudo element.
huangxueqing
Reported 2012-12-09 08:03:15 PST
Flexbox should ignore firstLine pseudo element. testcase: <style> div { display: -webkit-flex; display: -moz-flex; display: flex; } div::first-line { font-size: 10em;} p:first-child { -webkit-order: 1; -moz-order: 1; order: 1;} </style> <div> <p>The first item.</p> <p>The second item.</p> </div> In above case, the flex item <p>(both the firet one and the second) should ignore "font-size: 10em;" Spec[1] said that "None of the properties defined in this module apply to the ‘::first-line’ or ‘::first-letter’ pseudo-elements." In addition, css2[2] define that "The :first-line pseudo-element can only be attached to a block container element." opera 12.11, IE 10 and firefox 20 alpha have correct behavior. [1]http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-flexbox/#display-flex [2]http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/selector.html#first-line-pseudo
Attachments
patch (8.77 KB, patch)
2012-12-09 16:52 PST, huangxueqing
webkit.review.bot: commit-queue-
patch (8.85 KB, patch)
2012-12-11 07:36 PST, huangxueqing
webkit.review.bot: commit-queue-
patch (8.85 KB, patch)
2012-12-11 18:54 PST, huangxueqing
webkit.review.bot: commit-queue-
patch (7.23 KB, patch)
2012-12-11 22:10 PST, huangxueqing
no flags
patch (7.23 KB, patch)
2012-12-15 19:59 PST, huangxueqing
no flags
huangxueqing
Comment 1 2012-12-09 16:52:02 PST
Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment 2 2012-12-09 22:14:00 PST
(In reply to comment #0) > Spec[1] said that "None of the properties defined in this module apply to the > ‘::first-line’ or ‘::first-letter’ pseudo-elements." Yes, but 'font-size' isn't a property defined in this module. I think the relevant prose here is this: # Flex containers are not block containers,... > In addition, css2[2] define that "The :first-line pseudo-element can only be > attached to a block container element." > > [1]http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-flexbox/#display-flex
huangxueqing
Comment 3 2012-12-09 22:40:46 PST
(In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #0) > > Spec[1] said that "None of the properties defined in this module apply to the > > ‘::first-line’ or ‘::first-letter’ pseudo-elements." > > Yes, but 'font-size' isn't a property defined in this module. I think the relevant prose here is this: > > # Flex containers are not block containers,... > Exactly. > > In addition, css2[2] define that "The :first-line pseudo-element can only be > > attached to a block container element." > > > > [1]http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-flexbox/#display-flex
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 4 2012-12-10 02:40:16 PST
Comment on attachment 178452 [details] patch Attachment 178452 [details] did not pass chromium-ews (chromium-xvfb): Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/15223604 New failing tests: css3/flexbox/inline-flex-ignore-firstLine.html css3/flexbox/flex-ignore-firstLine.html css3/flexbox/inline-flex-item-firstLine-valid.html css3/flexbox/flex-item-firstLine-valid.html
Build Bot
Comment 5 2012-12-10 08:27:58 PST
Comment on attachment 178452 [details] patch Attachment 178452 [details] did not pass mac-ews (mac): Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/15230647 New failing tests: css3/flexbox/inline-flex-item-firstLine-valid.html
huangxueqing
Comment 6 2012-12-11 07:36:04 PST
Created attachment 178802 [details] patch It seems that font-size has different height in Chromium, i change test case use line-height to insteat it.
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 7 2012-12-11 08:41:14 PST
Comment on attachment 178802 [details] patch Attachment 178802 [details] did not pass chromium-ews (chromium-xvfb): Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/15278156 New failing tests: css3/flexbox/inline-flex-item-firstLine-valid.html
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 8 2012-12-11 09:45:48 PST
Comment on attachment 178802 [details] patch Attachment 178802 [details] did not pass chromium-ews (chromium-xvfb): Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/15278181 New failing tests: css3/flexbox/inline-flex-item-firstLine-valid.html
huangxueqing
Comment 9 2012-12-11 18:54:13 PST
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 10 2012-12-11 20:41:35 PST
Comment on attachment 178944 [details] patch Attachment 178944 [details] did not pass chromium-ews (chromium-xvfb): Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/15280334 New failing tests: css3/flexbox/inline-flex-item-firstLine-valid.html
huangxueqing
Comment 11 2012-12-11 22:10:53 PST
huangxueqing
Comment 12 2012-12-15 19:59:49 PST
Tony Chang
Comment 13 2012-12-18 14:04:18 PST
(In reply to comment #0) > Flexbox should ignore firstLine pseudo element. > testcase: > <style> > div { display: -webkit-flex; display: -moz-flex; display: flex; } > div::first-line { font-size: 10em;} > p:first-child { -webkit-order: 1; -moz-order: 1; order: 1;} > </style> > <div> > <p>The first item.</p> > <p>The second item.</p> > </div> > In above case, the flex item <p>(both the firet one and the second) should ignore "font-size: 10em;" > > Spec[1] said that "None of the properties defined in this module apply to the ‘::first-line’ or ‘::first-letter’ pseudo-elements." > In addition, css2[2] define that "The :first-line pseudo-element can only be attached to a block container element." Are you sure that's what this is saying? I think the spec means that you can't, e.g., do div::first-line { -webkit-order: 2; } in an attempt to move div::first-line. I don't see why the font-size shouldn't apply here.
Tab Atkins
Comment 14 2012-12-18 14:09:22 PST
(In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #0) > > Flexbox should ignore firstLine pseudo element. > > testcase: > > <style> > > div { display: -webkit-flex; display: -moz-flex; display: flex; } > > div::first-line { font-size: 10em;} > > p:first-child { -webkit-order: 1; -moz-order: 1; order: 1;} > > </style> > > <div> > > <p>The first item.</p> > > <p>The second item.</p> > > </div> > > In above case, the flex item <p>(both the firet one and the second) should ignore "font-size: 10em;" > > > > Spec[1] said that "None of the properties defined in this module apply to the ‘::first-line’ or ‘::first-letter’ pseudo-elements." > > In addition, css2[2] define that "The :first-line pseudo-element can only be attached to a block container element." > > Are you sure that's what this is saying? I think the spec means that you can't, e.g., do > div::first-line { > -webkit-order: 2; > } > > in an attempt to move div::first-line. I don't see why the font-size shouldn't apply here. Tony is correct. Read the line again - the properties *in this spec* don't apply to ::first-line or ::first-letter. That just mean you can't do something like Tony's example. CSS 2.1's text was written before Flexbox had been created, so don't read too much into the precise term "block container element". It's actually undefined whether ::first-line/letter should apply to a flexbox. I'll ask on www-style.
huangxueqing
Comment 15 2012-12-18 18:21:31 PST
(In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #13) > > (In reply to comment #0) > > > Flexbox should ignore firstLine pseudo element. > > > testcase: > > > <style> > > > div { display: -webkit-flex; display: -moz-flex; display: flex; } > > > div::first-line { font-size: 10em;} > > > p:first-child { -webkit-order: 1; -moz-order: 1; order: 1;} > > > </style> > > > <div> > > > <p>The first item.</p> > > > <p>The second item.</p> > > > </div> > > > In above case, the flex item <p>(both the firet one and the second) should ignore "font-size: 10em;" > > > > > > Spec[1] said that "None of the properties defined in this module apply to the ‘::first-line’ or ‘::first-letter’ pseudo-elements." > > > In addition, css2[2] define that "The :first-line pseudo-element can only be attached to a block container element." > > > > Are you sure that's what this is saying? I think the spec means that you can't, e.g., do > > div::first-line { > > -webkit-order: 2; > > } > > > > in an attempt to move div::first-line. I don't see why the font-size shouldn't apply here. > > Tony is correct. Read the line again - the properties *in this spec* don't apply to ::first-line or ::first-letter. That just mean you can't do something like Tony's example. > > CSS 2.1's text was written before Flexbox had been created, so don't read too much into the precise term "block container element". It's actually undefined whether ::first-line/letter should apply to a flexbox. I'll ask on www-style. Your are totally correct, it's undefined in specs. What i mean was that it's make no sense that flex item apply ::first-line or ::first-letter, as above example, "-webkit-order: 1" make "The first item." was not the first child of div in term of views (behind of "The second item."), it apply "font-size: 10em" was confusion. Maybe this was wrong place to discuss this problem. Futher, for undefined things, should we make webkit consistent with mozilla, opera and IE 10?
Tony Chang
Comment 16 2013-02-15 12:46:02 PST
Comment on attachment 179639 [details] patch The CSS WG decided that first-line and first-letter should not apply to flex containers: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-flexbox/issues-cr-2012#issue-13
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 17 2013-02-15 13:18:20 PST
Comment on attachment 179639 [details] patch Clearing flags on attachment: 179639 Committed r143042: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/143042>
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 18 2013-02-15 13:18:25 PST
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.