It should! <rdar://problem/12838490>
Created attachment 178278 [details] proposed patch
Comment on attachment 178278 [details] proposed patch Attachment 178278 [details] did not pass qt-wk2-ews (qt): Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/15183560
Created attachment 178282 [details] with a build fix
Comment on attachment 178282 [details] with a build fix Attachment 178282 [details] did not pass qt-wk2-ews (qt): Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/15188454
Created attachment 178285 [details] more build fixing
Comment on attachment 178285 [details] more build fixing View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=178285&action=review > Source/WebKit2/NetworkProcess/mac/RemoteNetworkingContext.h:46 > - RemoteNetworkingContext(bool needsSiteSpecificQuirks, bool localFileContentSniffingEnabled); > + RemoteNetworkingContext(bool needsSiteSpecificQuirks, bool localFileContentSniffingEnabled, bool privateBrowsingEnabled); Could we make this be enums instead of bools?
Committed <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/136997>. > Could we make this be enums instead of bools? I'm not sure if we really need to, at least not yet. We primarily use enums for readability, but when we're done hooking up all the arguments, there will be no mysterious false and true literals. Of course, there is the added benefit of type safety, which is worth considering too.