I think this would be more consistent with the existing macro naming conventions. From Platform.h: USE() - use a particular third-party library or optional OS service ENABLE() - turn on a specific feature of WebKit
I guess this makes sense, any objection Martin?
No objections from me!
Lazlo would you provide a patch?
(In reply to comment #3) > Lazlo would you provide a patch? I can provide a patch but I was not planning on it. I wish there would be a more explicit way to mark that the bug author is not actively pursuing fixing the bug (there is of course value in just creating and filing a bug) - but I guess leaving the bug unassigned is the closest we have. Feel free to grab it if you interested.
Created attachment 187250 [details] Patch
I would prefer not to make changes under WebKit/blackberry as I think those changes are not necessary. As far as I can tell AboutDataUseFeatures.in is not kept up with changes.
Created attachment 187307 [details] Patch
Comment on attachment 187307 [details] Patch Looks good to me.
Comment on attachment 187307 [details] Patch Looks good but needs to be rebased before landing!
Created attachment 187468 [details] Patch
(In reply to comment #9) > (From update of attachment 187307 [details]) > Looks good but needs to be rebased before landing! Thanks for the review! I rebased the patch.
Comment on attachment 187468 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 187468 Committed r142395: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/142395>
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.