WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
103364
HTMLCollection on Document should be stored on NodeListsNodeData like other HTMLCollections and LiveNodeLists
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103364
Summary
HTMLCollection on Document should be stored on NodeListsNodeData like other H...
Ryosuke Niwa
Reported
2012-11-26 22:08:30 PST
HTMLCollection on Document should use NodeRareData like other HTMLCollection and LiveNodeList
Attachments
Cleanup
(36.32 KB, patch)
2012-11-27 01:31 PST
,
Ryosuke Niwa
andersca
: review+
rniwa
: commit-queue-
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 1
2012-11-27 01:31:41 PST
Created
attachment 176196
[details]
Cleanup
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 2
2012-11-27 11:27:21 PST
Comment on
attachment 176196
[details]
Cleanup Oh, oops. This changelog contains the old bug title :(
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 3
2012-11-27 11:59:24 PST
Committed
r135893
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/135893
>
Darin Adler
Comment 4
2012-11-27 12:14:56 PST
Comment on
attachment 176196
[details]
Cleanup View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=176196&action=review
> Source/WebCore/dom/NodeRareData.h:79 > + PassRefPtr<T> addCacheWithAtomicName(Node* node, CollectionType collectionType)
Could this have been ContainerNode* across the board instead of Node*?
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 5
2012-11-27 12:17:36 PST
(In reply to
comment #4
)
> (From update of
attachment 176196
[details]
) > View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=176196&action=review
> > > Source/WebCore/dom/NodeRareData.h:79 > > + PassRefPtr<T> addCacheWithAtomicName(Node* node, CollectionType collectionType) > > Could this have been ContainerNode* across the board instead of Node*?
No. Some addCacheWithAtomicName callers are member functions of Node. It is true that all owner nodes are ContainerNode since they’re either Document, Element, or ShadowRoot but we probably need to move all those member functions from Node to ContainerNode in order to change the type. Otherwise, we’ll be doing a lot of const_casts, which isn’t particularly better than the current code IMO.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug