WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
102534
[chromium] Add flag to enable/disable touch adjustment at runtime.
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102534
Summary
[chromium] Add flag to enable/disable touch adjustment at runtime.
Kevin Ellis
Reported
2012-11-16 10:12:29 PST
[chromium] Add flag to enable/disable touch adjustment at runtime.
Attachments
Patch
(7.30 KB, patch)
2012-11-16 10:16 PST
,
Kevin Ellis
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(9.94 KB, patch)
2012-11-20 09:54 PST
,
Kevin Ellis
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(9.95 KB, patch)
2012-11-20 11:58 PST
,
Kevin Ellis
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(8.60 KB, patch)
2012-11-20 13:25 PST
,
Kevin Ellis
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(8.60 KB, patch)
2012-11-20 14:04 PST
,
Kevin Ellis
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(9.31 KB, patch)
2012-11-21 06:19 PST
,
Kevin Ellis
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(5)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Kevin Ellis
Comment 1
2012-11-16 10:16:36 PST
Created
attachment 174717
[details]
Patch
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 2
2012-11-16 10:20:42 PST
Please wait for approval from
abarth@webkit.org
,
dglazkov@chromium.org
,
fishd@chromium.org
,
jamesr@chromium.org
or
tkent@chromium.org
before submitting, as this patch contains changes to the Chromium public API. See also
https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/ChromiumWebKitAPI
.
James Robinson
Comment 3
2012-11-16 10:32:22 PST
Comment on
attachment 174717
[details]
Patch I'm not terribly familiar with this feature - why does it make sense to adjust this on a per-process basis instead of something per WebView? When would an embedder want to toggle this behavior?
Kevin Ellis
Comment 4
2012-11-16 13:21:44 PST
(In reply to
comment #3
)
> (From update of
attachment 174717
[details]
) > I'm not terribly familiar with this feature - why does it make sense to adjust this on a per-process basis instead of something per WebView? When would an embedder want to toggle this behavior?
The primary use of this feature is for the chrome developer to diagnose problems with touch. To this end, following the same pattern used for enabling/disabling touch events.
Kevin Ellis
Comment 5
2012-11-20 09:54:15 PST
Created
attachment 175237
[details]
Patch
Allan Sandfeld Jensen
Comment 6
2012-11-20 10:59:52 PST
Comment on
attachment 175237
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=175237&action=review
Looks good overall.
> Source/WebCore/page/EventHandler.cpp:2706 > +bool EventHandler::touchAdjustmentEnabled(const PlatformGestureEvent& event) > +{ > + if (m_frame->settings() && !m_frame->settings()->touchAdjustmentEnabled()) > + return false; > + return !event.area().isEmpty(); > +}
With the combination of checking both the flag and if gesture events come with an area I am not sure touchAdjustmentEnabled is the right word. Perhaps shouldApplyTouchAdjustment, or something similar.
Adam Barth
Comment 7
2012-11-20 11:26:51 PST
Comment on
attachment 175237
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=175237&action=review
> Source/WebCore/page/Settings.h:295 > +#if ENABLE(TOUCH_ADJUSTMENT) > + void setEnableTouchAdjustment(bool flag) { m_touchAdjustmentEnabled = flag; } > + bool touchAdjustmentEnabled() const { return m_touchAdjustmentEnabled; } > +#endif
Please use Settings.in rather than creating this setting manually.
Kevin Ellis
Comment 8
2012-11-20 11:58:10 PST
Created
attachment 175256
[details]
Patch
Kevin Ellis
Comment 9
2012-11-20 13:25:34 PST
Created
attachment 175267
[details]
Patch
Kevin Ellis
Comment 10
2012-11-20 13:26:09 PST
Comment on
attachment 175237
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=175237&action=review
>> Source/WebCore/page/EventHandler.cpp:2706 >> +} > > With the combination of checking both the flag and if gesture events come with an area I am not sure touchAdjustmentEnabled is the right word. Perhaps shouldApplyTouchAdjustment, or something similar.
Done.
>> Source/WebCore/page/Settings.h:295 >> +#endif > > Please use Settings.in rather than creating this setting manually.
Done.
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 11
2012-11-20 13:27:52 PST
Attachment 175267
[details]
did not pass style-queue: Failed to run "['Tools/Scripts/check-webkit-style', '--diff-files', u'Source/WebCore/ChangeLog', u'Source/WebCor..." exit_code: 1 Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:21: Need whitespace between colon and description [changelog/filechangedescriptionwhitespace] [5] Total errors found: 1 in 8 files If any of these errors are false positives, please file a bug against check-webkit-style.
Kevin Ellis
Comment 12
2012-11-20 14:04:57 PST
Created
attachment 175274
[details]
Patch
Allan Sandfeld Jensen
Comment 13
2012-11-20 14:17:26 PST
Comment on
attachment 175274
[details]
Patch LGTM, but not a reviewer.
Antonio Gomes
Comment 14
2012-11-20 16:40:13 PST
Comment on
attachment 175274
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=175274&action=review
Looks good. One minor issue, one request and one question. would like to see another round before it lands, then the r-.
> Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:9 > + [chromium] Add flag to enable/disable touch adjustment at runtime. > +
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102534
> + > + Reviewed by NOBODY (OOPS!). > + > + Add setting for enabling or disabling touch adjustment. > +
You should mention here why the compile time only flag is not enough. Things like when compile-time would be enabled, but the run-time setting disable, etc.
> Source/WebCore/page/EventHandler.cpp:2701 > +bool EventHandler::shouldApplyTouchAdjustment(const PlatformGestureEvent& event)
const?
> Source/WebCore/page/Settings.in:143 > +touchAdjustmentEnabled initial=true
default true? How does it work when the compile flag is disabled? Do we care? Found it a bit odd ...
Kevin Ellis
Comment 15
2012-11-21 06:19:23 PST
Created
attachment 175425
[details]
Patch
Kevin Ellis
Comment 16
2012-11-21 06:22:45 PST
Comment on
attachment 175274
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=175274&action=review
>> Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:9 >> + > > You should mention here why the compile time only flag is not enough. Things like when compile-time would be enabled, but the run-time setting disable, etc.
Done.
>> Source/WebCore/page/EventHandler.cpp:2701 >> +bool EventHandler::shouldApplyTouchAdjustment(const PlatformGestureEvent& event) > > const?
Done.
>> Source/WebCore/page/Settings.in:143 >> +touchAdjustmentEnabled initial=true > > default true? How does it work when the compile flag is disabled? Do we care? Found it a bit odd ...
Added comment to indicate that both the compile option is also required to enable touch adjustment. This option provides dynamic control to disable touch adjustment as required at run-time.
Antonio Gomes
Comment 17
2012-11-21 06:40:43 PST
Comment on
attachment 175425
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=175425&action=review
> Source/WebCore/page/EventHandler.cpp:2750 > bool EventHandler::adjustGesturePosition(const PlatformGestureEvent& gestureEvent, IntPoint& adjustedPoint)
did not check all call sites, but this returned bool seems not too useful.
Adam Barth
Comment 18
2012-11-21 09:49:42 PST
Comment on
attachment 175425
[details]
Patch API change LGTM
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 19
2012-11-21 10:10:04 PST
Comment on
attachment 175425
[details]
Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 175425 Committed
r135414
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/135414
>
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 20
2012-11-21 10:10:09 PST
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 21
2013-01-04 00:52:57 PST
Comment on
attachment 175274
[details]
Patch Cleared review? from obsolete
attachment 175274
[details]
so that this bug does not appear in
http://webkit.org/pending-review
. If you would like this patch reviewed, please attach it to a new bug (or re-open this bug before marking it for review again).
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug