RESOLVED FIXED 102341
Web Inspector: Fix new JS compiler warnings.
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102341
Summary Web Inspector: Fix new JS compiler warnings.
eustas.bug
Reported 2012-11-14 23:19:21 PST
New version of compiler finds new inconsistencies. 1) DOMAgent.js:1285: actual parameter 1 of Object.defineProperty does not match formal parameter 2) ElementsPanel.js:81: Property domBreakpointsSidebarPane never defined on WebInspector 3) Script.js:152: actual parameter 4 of DebuggerAgent.setScriptSource does not match formal parameter
Attachments
Patch (3.68 KB, patch)
2012-11-14 23:22 PST, eustas.bug
no flags
Patch (3.57 KB, patch)
2012-11-15 00:17 PST, eustas.bug
no flags
eustas.bug
Comment 1 2012-11-14 23:22:46 PST
Pavel Feldman
Comment 2 2012-11-14 23:31:16 PST
Comment on attachment 174359 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=174359&action=review > Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/DOMAgent.js:1284 > + for (var i = 0; i < touchEvents.length; ++i) { } around the block
eustas.bug
Comment 3 2012-11-15 00:11:15 PST
Comment on attachment 174359 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=174359&action=review >> Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/DOMAgent.js:1284 >> + for (var i = 0; i < touchEvents.length; ++i) > > { } around the block Fixed.
eustas.bug
Comment 4 2012-11-15 00:17:09 PST
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 5 2012-11-15 00:55:35 PST
Comment on attachment 174364 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 174364 Committed r134751: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/134751>
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 6 2012-11-15 00:55:39 PST
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Andrey Adaikin
Comment 7 2012-11-15 02:25:12 PST
Comment on attachment 174364 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=174364&action=review > Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/DOMAgent.js:1285 > + for (var j = 0; j < recepients.length; ++j) { IMO, now you have more lines of code, and less readable code. BTW, I think JS compiler does not complain because it treats the "recepients" as "@type {?}", now? otherwise I don't see why the new version is more typed then the old one. And one more thing. "recepients" -> "recipients"
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.