EOM
Created attachment 170921 [details] Patch
Comment on attachment 170921 [details] Patch Attachment 170921 [details] did not pass qt-ews (qt): Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/14608104
Comment on attachment 170921 [details] Patch Attachment 170921 [details] did not pass qt-wk2-ews (qt): Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/14608105
Comment on attachment 170921 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=170921&action=review > Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:3 > + Web Inspector: instrument chromium GlyphCache. It keeps ~2mb. ~2mb on what page? > Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:9 > + Can you add a test for this? > Source/WebCore/platform/PlatformMemoryInstrumentation.cpp:38 > +MemoryObjectType PlatformMemoryTypes::GlyphCache = "MemoryCache.GlyphCache"; I'd rather use Fonts.GlyphCache instead of MemoryCache.GlyphCache.
Committed r132658: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/132658>
Reverted r132658 for reason: It broke the Qt build Committed r132661: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/132661>
Please don't ignore the EWS bots!
Created attachment 170938 [details] Patch
Committed r132725: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/132725>
Re-opened since this is blocked by bug 100596
Created attachment 171393 [details] would not compile on chromium without skia patch
Comment on attachment 171393 [details] would not compile on chromium without skia patch Attachment 171393 [details] did not pass cr-android-ews (chromium-android): Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/14632405
Comment on attachment 171393 [details] would not compile on chromium without skia patch Attachment 171393 [details] did not pass chromium-ews (chromium-xvfb): Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/14630445
Comment on attachment 171393 [details] would not compile on chromium without skia patch Is this still relevant?
Comment on attachment 171393 [details] would not compile on chromium without skia patch Please re-request review in case still relevant
Chromium has left the building. Won't fix.