Web Inspector: third
pfeldman: and I thought running for 100000 was too childish ^^
(In reply to comment #1) > pfeldman: and I thought running for 100000 was too childish ^^ He-he, it is just that you were not as fast!
(In reply to comment #2) > He-he, it is just that you were not as fast! I'll agree that your publishing 99998, 99999 and 100000 in a row quite surprised me!
Of course, this isn't the real 100,000th bug. The bugs.webkit.org site used to be bugzilla.opendarwin.org, and some of the early bug numbers were burned for non-WebKit issues.
Created attachment 170228 [details] patch
oops haha
Comment on attachment 170228 [details] patch lulz
(In reply to comment #5) > Created an attachment (id=170228) [details] > patch I think this patch is important, so this patch deserves honor of 1M