Summary: | [EFL][DRT] Switch default backing store to single | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | Ryuan Choi <ryuan.choi> | ||||||
Component: | WebKit EFL | Assignee: | Ryuan Choi <ryuan.choi> | ||||||
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||||||||
Severity: | Normal | CC: | gyuyoung.kim, kbalazs, lucas.de.marchi, rakuco, webkit.review.bot | ||||||
Priority: | P2 | ||||||||
Version: | 528+ (Nightly build) | ||||||||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||
URL: | http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-efl/2012-October/000316.html | ||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Ryuan Choi
2012-10-06 02:03:02 PDT
Created attachment 167492 [details]
Patch
Created attachment 167511 [details]
Patch
Comment on attachment 167511 [details]
Patch
rs=me.
Comment on attachment 167511 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 167511 Committed r130673: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/130673> All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug. By TBS, do you refer some EFL specific thingy or the TBS support in WebKit? In the second case I don't think it's wise to use another backend for testing that you actually ship. (In reply to comment #6) > By TBS, do you refer some EFL specific thingy or the TBS support in WebKit? In the second case I don't think it's wise to use another backend for testing that you actually ship. This is only Efl specific. WebKit1/Efl has used its own TBS (not in WebCore). Tizen had used TBS of WebKit1/Efl but moved to WebKit2/Efl. In case of other Efl applications using WebKit1/Efl such as elm_web and eve, they have used SBS as a default backing store. So, I believe that testing SBS is more reasonable. Thank you. |