|Summary:||[EFL][DRT] Switch default backing store to single|
|Product:||WebKit||Reporter:||Ryuan Choi <ryuan.choi>|
|Component:||WebKit EFL||Assignee:||Ryuan Choi <ryuan.choi>|
|Severity:||Normal||CC:||gyuyoung.kim, kbalazs, lucas.de.marchi, rakuco, webkit.review.bot|
|Version:||528+ (Nightly build)|
Description Ryuan Choi 2012-10-06 02:03:02 PDT
As discussed in webkit-efl mailing list, I think that it is more suitable to use ewk_view_single as a default backing store of DRT. After running pixel-tests in my local, single has 49 image-only regressions and tiled has 54 regressions. Patch will be added.
Comment 3 Eric Seidel (no email) 2012-10-08 11:41:30 PDT
Comment on attachment 167511 [details] Patch rs=me.
Comment 4 WebKit Review Bot 2012-10-08 12:18:31 PDT
Comment on attachment 167511 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 167511 Committed r130673: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/130673>
Comment 5 WebKit Review Bot 2012-10-08 12:18:34 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Comment 6 Balazs Kelemen 2012-10-09 14:59:53 PDT
By TBS, do you refer some EFL specific thingy or the TBS support in WebKit? In the second case I don't think it's wise to use another backend for testing that you actually ship.
Comment 7 Ryuan Choi 2012-10-09 16:01:11 PDT
(In reply to comment #6) > By TBS, do you refer some EFL specific thingy or the TBS support in WebKit? In the second case I don't think it's wise to use another backend for testing that you actually ship. This is only Efl specific. WebKit1/Efl has used its own TBS (not in WebCore). Tizen had used TBS of WebKit1/Efl but moved to WebKit2/Efl. In case of other Efl applications using WebKit1/Efl such as elm_web and eve, they have used SBS as a default backing store. So, I believe that testing SBS is more reasonable. Thank you.