Bug 91469

Summary: [Forms] Test expectations of datetime/datetime-local/time should not contain milliseconds when they aren't expected
Product: WebKit Reporter: yosin
Component: Tools / TestsAssignee: yosin
Status: RESOLVED FIXED    
Severity: Normal CC: tkent
Priority: P2    
Version: 528+ (Nightly build)   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Attachments:
Description Flags
Patch 1 none

yosin
Reported 2012-07-16 22:10:18 PDT
Following tests have wrong test expectations: * fsat/from/datetime/datetime-stepup-stepdown-from-renderer.html * fsat/from/datetimelocal/datetimelocal-stepup-stepdown-from-renderer.html * fsat/from/time/time-stepup-stepdown-from-renderer.html For very big step value like: shouldBe('stepUp("2012-02-12T20:13Z", "3.40282346e+38", null)', '"276760-09-13T00:00:00.000Z"'); In this case, an expectation should not have milliseconds, e.g. "276760-09-13T00:00:00". Before r119948 (introducing Decimal arithmetic), BasseDateAndTimeInputType::serialize checked whether resulted string containing milliseconds or not by using fmod(step, msecPerSecond), where msecPerSecond is 1000. This expression works fine when step isn't big number, and fmod(3.40282346e+38, 1000) returns 616 on my x86 linux box. Since r119948, BaseDateAndTimeInput::serialize uses same expression but it is done by decimal arithmetic, e.g. step.remainder(msecPerSecond).isZero(), and this expression returns false for big number.
Attachments
Patch 1 (8.66 KB, patch)
2012-07-16 22:42 PDT, yosin
no flags
yosin
Comment 1 2012-07-16 22:42:35 PDT
yosin
Comment 2 2012-07-16 22:43:27 PDT
Comment on attachment 152697 [details] Patch 1 Could you review this patch? Thanks in advance.
Kent Tamura
Comment 3 2012-07-16 23:54:57 PDT
Comment on attachment 152697 [details] Patch 1 View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=152697&action=review > LayoutTests/fast/forms/datetime/datetime-stepup-stepdown-from-renderer-expected.txt:18 > +PASS stepUp("2010-02-10T20:13Z", "3.40282346e+38", null) is "275760-09-13T00:00:00Z" Why don't the result 275760-09-13T00:00Z ?
yosin
Comment 4 2012-07-17 00:15:45 PDT
(In reply to comment #3) > (From update of attachment 152697 [details]) > View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=152697&action=review > > > LayoutTests/fast/forms/datetime/datetime-stepup-stepdown-from-renderer-expected.txt:18 > > +PASS stepUp("2010-02-10T20:13Z", "3.40282346e+38", null) is "275760-09-13T00:00:00Z" > > Why don't the result 275760-09-13T00:00Z ? In BaseDateAndTimeInputType::serializeWithComponents which called by BaseDateAndTimeInputType::serialize checks step value against millisecond per minute and second per millisecond as below: ... if (step.remainder(msecPerMinute).isZero()) return date.toString(DateComponents::None); if (step.remainder(msecPerSecond).isZero()) return date.toString(DateComponents::Second); return date.toString(DateComponents::Millisecond); In this test case, step value mod(3.40282346e+38, msecPerSecond) != 0 and mod(3.40282346e+38, 1000) == 0. So, we call DateComponent::toString with DateComents::Second argument. This is reason that we have "00:00:00" (including second) instead of "00:00" (no second), even if second is zero.
Kent Tamura
Comment 5 2012-07-17 00:20:05 PDT
Comment on attachment 152697 [details] Patch 1 ok
yosin
Comment 6 2012-07-17 00:23:26 PDT
Comment on attachment 152697 [details] Patch 1 Clearing flags on attachment: 152697 Committed r122815: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/122815>
yosin
Comment 7 2012-07-17 00:23:32 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.