Summary: | Chinese IM receives incorrect/duplicated key events in text fields in webpages in Safari. | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | Andreas Kling <kling> | ||||||||
Component: | UI Events | Assignee: | Alexey Proskuryakov <ap> | ||||||||
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||||||||||
Severity: | Normal | CC: | andersca, ap, dglazkov, webkit.review.bot | ||||||||
Priority: | P2 | Keywords: | InRadar | ||||||||
Version: | 528+ (Nightly build) | ||||||||||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||||
Bug Depends on: | 90368 | ||||||||||
Bug Blocks: | |||||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Andreas Kling
2012-06-13 17:21:09 PDT
Created attachment 147449 [details]
Patch
Comment on attachment 147449 [details]
Patch
Is there some good way to regression-test this?
(In reply to comment #2) > (From update of attachment 147449 [details]) > Is there some good way to regression-test this? I haven't been able to come up with a good way to manually test this, let alone something we could automate. :/ Committed r120329: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/120329> Re-opened since this is blocked by 90368 Created attachment 154179 [details]
proposed fix
Comment on attachment 154179 [details] proposed fix Attachment 154179 [details] did not pass chromium-ews (chromium-xvfb): Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/13339058 New failing tests: fast/forms/range/slider-onchange-event.html fast/forms/range/slider-mouse-events.html fast/forms/range/slider-delete-while-dragging-thumb.html Created attachment 154202 [details]
Archive of layout-test-results from gce-cr-linux-08
The attached test failures were seen while running run-webkit-tests on the chromium-ews.
Bot: gce-cr-linux-08 Port: <class 'webkitpy.common.config.ports.ChromiumXVFBPort'> Platform: Linux-2.6.39-gcg-201203291735-x86_64-with-Ubuntu-10.04-lucid
Comment on attachment 154179 [details]
proposed fix
r=me
Landed in <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/123630> (failing tests on chromium EWS couldn't possibly be related). |