Summary: | V8RecursionScope should call didLeaveScriptContext when recursionLevel reaches zero | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | Adam Klein <adamk> | ||||||
Component: | New Bugs | Assignee: | Adam Klein <adamk> | ||||||
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||||||||
Severity: | Normal | CC: | abarth, antonm, japhet, rafaelw | ||||||
Priority: | P2 | ||||||||
Version: | 528+ (Nightly build) | ||||||||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||
Bug Depends on: | |||||||||
Bug Blocks: | 73492 | ||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Adam Klein
2011-12-05 14:32:38 PST
Created attachment 117939 [details]
Patch
Comment on attachment 117939 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=117939&action=review > Source/WebCore/bindings/v8/V8RecursionScope.h:34 > +#if ENABLE(MUTATION_OBSERVERS) Presumably this shouldn't be conditional on MUTATION_OBSERVERS, right? Comment on attachment 117939 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=117939&action=review >> Source/WebCore/bindings/v8/V8RecursionScope.h:34 >> +#if ENABLE(MUTATION_OBSERVERS) > > Presumably this shouldn't be conditional on MUTATION_OBSERVERS, right? Heh, good catch, I picked a bad file to use as a template...Removed. Created attachment 117943 [details]
Patch for landing
Committed r102067: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/102067> |