Bug 62010
| Summary: | Implement the DOMCrypt API | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | Jarred Nicholls <jarred> |
| Component: | WebCore JavaScript | Assignee: | Jarred Nicholls <jarred> |
| Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | ||
| Severity: | Enhancement | CC: | abarth, ap, ariya.hidayat, ddahl, donggwan.kim, ehsan, gavin.sharp, jshin, kennyluck, mehmetgelisin, mihnea, mike, rsleevi, sam, syoichi, wade.colson |
| Priority: | P5 | ||
| Version: | 528+ (Nightly build) | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
Jarred Nicholls
Master bug for implementing the DOMCrypt API proposal in WebKit
Mailing List threads:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-security/2011Jun/0000.html
http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2011-May/031741.html
Spec:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Privacy/Features/DOMCryptAPISpec/Latest
Mozilla Implementation:
https://github.com/daviddahl/domcrypt
http://mozilla.ddahl.com/domcrypt/demos/demo.html
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649154
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657432
| Attachments | ||
|---|---|---|
| Add attachment proposed patch, testcase, etc. |
David Dahl
Currently, the spec is a bit rough and in flux, but I am working to update it as more feedback and criticism comes in. Also, I need to use WebIDL or something like that to make types crystal clear.
David Dahl
A summary of the discussion is being built here: http://etherpad.mozilla.com:9000/DOMCrypt-discussion
Adam Barth
I might as well own this bug for now. Folk should feel free to steal it from me if they want.
David Dahl
(In reply to comment #3)
> I might as well own this bug for now. Folk should feel free to steal it from me if they want.
Don't hesitate to ping me on mozilla irc, as 'ddahl'.
I am working the WebIDL version of the spec right now and aggregating more feedback.
Jarred Nicholls
I'll be doing some experimental implementation of this starting late next week; especially since the key exchange bits are going to be a sibling spec later on (wise move IMHO). Assuming the WebIDL will be in the spec by then, I can verify it's not missing anything obvious (e.g. as of now the createHash method is missing its plain text argument, which I know isn't really the case but just an omission in the spec draft).
David Dahl
(In reply to comment #5)
> I'll be doing some experimental implementation of this starting late next week; especially since the key exchange bits are going to be a sibling spec later on (wise move IMHO). Assuming the WebIDL will be in the spec by then, I can verify it's not missing anything obvious (e.g. as of now the createHash method is missing its plain text argument, which I know isn't really the case but just an omission in the spec draft).
I have started making a WebIDL document for the spec here: https://bug649154.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=537428
This is the spec as the implementation stands right now - which is incorrect based on the feedback in the mailing lists. I am working on a new rev today that updates it for what we actually need.
Wade Colson
*** Bug 260998 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Seen from the domain http://volichat.com
Page where seen: http://volichat.com/random-chat-rooms
Marked for reference. Resolved as fixed @bugzilla.
Alexey Proskuryakov
DOMCrypt evolved into WebCrypto, which we already implement.