Summary: | Implement the DOMCrypt API | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | Jarred Nicholls <jarred> |
Component: | WebCore JavaScript | Assignee: | Jarred Nicholls <jarred> |
Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | ||
Severity: | Enhancement | CC: | abarth, ap, ariya.hidayat, ddahl, donggwan.kim, ehsan, gavin.sharp, jshin, kennyluck, mehmetgelisin, mihnea, mike, rsleevi, sam, syoichi, wade.colson |
Priority: | P5 | ||
Version: | 528+ (Nightly build) | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All |
Description
Jarred Nicholls
2011-06-03 06:41:01 PDT
Currently, the spec is a bit rough and in flux, but I am working to update it as more feedback and criticism comes in. Also, I need to use WebIDL or something like that to make types crystal clear. A summary of the discussion is being built here: http://etherpad.mozilla.com:9000/DOMCrypt-discussion I might as well own this bug for now. Folk should feel free to steal it from me if they want. (In reply to comment #3) > I might as well own this bug for now. Folk should feel free to steal it from me if they want. Don't hesitate to ping me on mozilla irc, as 'ddahl'. I am working the WebIDL version of the spec right now and aggregating more feedback. I'll be doing some experimental implementation of this starting late next week; especially since the key exchange bits are going to be a sibling spec later on (wise move IMHO). Assuming the WebIDL will be in the spec by then, I can verify it's not missing anything obvious (e.g. as of now the createHash method is missing its plain text argument, which I know isn't really the case but just an omission in the spec draft). (In reply to comment #5) > I'll be doing some experimental implementation of this starting late next week; especially since the key exchange bits are going to be a sibling spec later on (wise move IMHO). Assuming the WebIDL will be in the spec by then, I can verify it's not missing anything obvious (e.g. as of now the createHash method is missing its plain text argument, which I know isn't really the case but just an omission in the spec draft). I have started making a WebIDL document for the spec here: https://bug649154.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=537428 This is the spec as the implementation stands right now - which is incorrect based on the feedback in the mailing lists. I am working on a new rev today that updates it for what we actually need. *** Bug 260998 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Seen from the domain http://volichat.com Page where seen: http://volichat.com/random-chat-rooms Marked for reference. Resolved as fixed @bugzilla. DOMCrypt evolved into WebCrypto, which we already implement. |