|Summary:||REGRESSION (r66062) - inputElement.innerText = "" throws|
|Product:||WebKit||Reporter:||Brady Eidson <email@example.com>|
|Component:||HTML DOM||Assignee:||Nobody <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Version:||528+ (Nightly build)|
REGRESSION (r66062) - set(Inner/Outer)Text on many types of elements throws an exception, and they didn't before. Link to the change: http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/66057 Link to the original bug: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44626 ChangeLog says "this is just moving code and should have no functional change." But by replacing the usage of "HTMLElement::endTagRequirement()" with "HTMLElement::ieForbidsInsertHTML()" in 3 key places in HTMLElement, it had functional change. Before this change, HTMLElement::deprecatedCreateContextualFragment would only fail to return a fragment for <wbr> elements. Now it fails for ~20 tag names listed in HTMLElement::ieForbidsInsertHTML() Before this change, HTMLElement::setInnerText and HTMLElement::setOuterText only threw exceptions for 10 tag names they knew about, and <wbr>. Now they throw exceptions for the 10 tag names they knew about, and the ~20 listed in HTMLElement::ieForbidsInsertHTML() This broke compatibility with other browsers like Firefox and Opera. It also *broke* compatibility with IE while purporting to match IE's rules, as noted in the FIXME comment in ieForbidsInsertHTML() Test case coming soon...
Created an attachment (id=83852) [details] Test derived from This is a test derived from a real world affected site my.schedulemaster.com Sadly the real site requires logins and no pilot would be likely to hand theirs out (I sure am not). But let's just say that a lot of pilots really like WebKit based browsers. :)
Created an attachment (id=83853) [details] Better test with explanatory text
innerText isn't spec'd, but the change in question was not supposed to change behavior. Will investigate what changed.
Firefox doesn't support innerText, so the testcase is misleading. I suspect the site in question follows a different codepath for firefox.
Has this shipped in a Safari? I'm testing with Version 5.0.3 (6533.19.4) and I see the same exception as top of tree.
(In reply to comment #6) > Has this shipped in a Safari? I'm testing with Version 5.0.3 (6533.19.4) and I see the same exception as top of tree. Hmmmm. Admittedly and amusingly I'd never tried with Safari 5.0.3, I only tried with ToT and the patch partially rolled out. Maybe "partially" rolled out invented the state I was expecting to see. Will explore more when I'm around code on Monday.