Summary: | Rename TransformationMatrix to Transform | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | Chris Marrin <cmarrin> |
Component: | Platform | Assignee: | Nobody <webkit-unassigned> |
Status: | NEW --- | ||
Severity: | Normal | CC: | simon.fraser |
Priority: | P2 | ||
Version: | 528+ (Nightly build) | ||
Hardware: | PC | ||
OS: | OS X 10.5 |
Description
Chris Marrin
2010-09-01 12:58:56 PDT
Not sure I agree. SVG already has SVGTransform, which has an SVGMatrix. (In reply to comment #1) > Not sure I agree. SVG already has SVGTransform, which has an SVGMatrix. And we have CSSMatrix. It's a bit muddled. But SVGMatrix is a simple wrapper around AffineTransform and SVGTransform contains an AffineTransform. CSSMatrix contains a TransformationMatrix. I don't think we're going to solve the "transform" vs "matrix" naming of the DOM objects. So I think the best we can do is make the underlying classes consistent. AffineTransform and Transform seem as consistent as we're going to get. |