|Product:||WebKit||Reporter:||Geoffrey Garen <ggaren>|
|Severity:||Normal||CC:||bweinstein, joepeck, keishi, pfeldman, pmuellr, rik, ukai, yurys|
|Version:||528+ (Nightly build)|
|OS:||OS X 10.5|
Description Geoffrey Garen 2010-01-13 12:19:18 PST
From https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33469: > 1. I don't think "InjectedScript", which is a fairly general phrase, is a good > name to give to this technology. I'd prefer a name that conveyed the fact that > this technology is only safe to use in limited circumstances. How about > "InspectorHost" (inside the inspected page) and "InspectorClient" (the Web > Inspector UI). > I agree with you that the naming is not the best. Currently the inspector front-end delegate is called InjectedScriptHost. We should come up with something more specific.