Bug 33194 – REGRESSION(r48566): typeof form element group returns "function", causing a regression

• Component: DOM
• Status: RESOLVED CONFIGURATION CHANGED

[Brian Campbell]

Created attachment 45859 [details]
Example of behavior, displays "object" in Safari 4.0.4, but "function" in WebKit nightly

In Safari 4.0.4, getting a form element group via document.forms[0].somename gives you a collection that returns "object" when you call typeof on it. In the latest WebKit nightly (r52686), it returns "function".  This behavior is discussed in bug 14547, but it did not previously apply to the collections retrieved by accessing a form element group.

This has caused a regression on the following page: https://nhworksjobmatch.nhes.nh.gov/regstep1of3.asp?rt=ind . Once you click past the privacy agreement, you get a registration form, with some radio buttons near the bottom. If you fill out the form and click "next", it runs some validation code, which results in an assertion failure, as it tries to check that the form element of the given name has a typeof "object", when in WebKit it has a typeof "function":


			// Get an object reference to the HTML control
			obj = eval("document.forms[" + ary[counter].FormIndex + "]." + ary[counter].ControlName);
		}
 
		// Did it eval?
		if (typeof(obj) != "object") 
		{ 
			alert("Developer Error: document.forms[" + ary[counter].FormIndex + "]." + ary[counter].ControlName + " did not evaluate to a valid object!");
			return false;
		}

A fix for this problem, to allow NodeLists to be callable but have type "object", has been discussed in bug 14547, but does not appear to be implemented.

[Alexey Proskuryakov]

Apparently broken in bug 29519.

[Sam Weinig]

<rdar://problem/7511507>

[Ahmad Saleem]

I am unable to reproduce this bug in Safari 15.6 on macOS 12.5 and it show this as "object" and it is matching with other browsers (Chrome Canary 106 and Firefox Nightly 105). I think it was fixed along the way, I am going to mark this as "RESOLVED CONFIGURATION CHANGED".

If it is still reproducible, please reopen while sharing updated test case. Thanks!