| Summary: | Rename ServiceWorkerInitializationData / ServiceWorkerInformation so they can be reused by shared workers | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | Chris Dumez <cdumez> | ||||
| Component: | WebKit2 | Assignee: | Chris Dumez <cdumez> | ||||
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | Normal | CC: | achristensen, darin, ggaren, kkinnunen, webkit-bug-importer, youennf | ||||
| Priority: | P2 | Keywords: | InRadar | ||||
| Version: | WebKit Nightly Build | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Bug Depends on: | |||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 235958 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Chris Dumez
2022-02-03 09:47:57 PST
Created attachment 450787 [details]
Patch
Comment on attachment 450787 [details]
Patch
Is "RemoteWorker" used elsewhere?
I might have called this ServiceOrSharedWorkerInformation
(In reply to Alex Christensen from comment #2) > Comment on attachment 450787 [details] > Patch > > Is "RemoteWorker" used elsewhere? > I might have called this ServiceOrSharedWorkerInformation Yes, I have used remote worker in a few patches already. The naming was suggested by Youenn during an earlier review. I am really happy to have a term of art instead of "x or y" every time! Committed r289063 (246770@main): <https://commits.webkit.org/246770@main> All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug and clearing flags on attachment 450787 [details]. |