Change the confusing feature name for testing purpose

• Component: Tools / Tests
• Status: RESOLVED FIXED

[Basuke Suzuki]

The difference is the existence of last s character. 

I believe ENABLE_EXPERIMENTAL_FEATURE is the typo, but I don't know the history well so it can be the left over of something. Anyway, ENABLE(EXPERIMENTAL_FEATURE) won't be true with current toolchain. It will be renamed to ENABLE(EXPERIMENTAL_FEATURES) or be deleted from the codebase if it won't be used.

[Tim Horton]

Do you mean the EXPERIMENTAL_FEATURE in the tests inside Source/WebKit/Scripts/webkit? because that is actually a unnamed single mock feature for tests, not the same as ENABLE(EXPERIMENTAL_FEATURES). But I agree that it should have a less bizarrely ambiguous name, if that is the one you are talking about (it's the only one I can find). Wenson suggested `MY_FEATURE` (you could also imagine `FEATURE_FOR_TESTING` or something).

[Basuke Suzuki]

(In reply to Tim Horton from comment #1)
> Do you mean the EXPERIMENTAL_FEATURE in the tests inside
> Source/WebKit/Scripts/webkit?

Correct.

> because that is actually a unnamed single mock
> feature for tests, not the same as ENABLE(EXPERIMENTAL_FEATURES). But I
> agree that it should have a less bizarrely ambiguous name, if that is the
> one you are talking about (it's the only one I can find). Wenson suggested
> `MY_FEATURE` (you could also imagine `FEATURE_FOR_TESTING` or something).

Make sense. I like the `FEATURE_FOR_TESTING` for replacement. Also it should be better to change the title of this bug. How about "Change the confusing feature name for testing purpose"?

[Tim Horton]

(In reply to Basuke Suzuki from comment #2)
> (In reply to Tim Horton from comment #1)
> > Do you mean the EXPERIMENTAL_FEATURE in the tests inside
> > Source/WebKit/Scripts/webkit?
> 
> Correct.
> 
> > because that is actually a unnamed single mock
> > feature for tests, not the same as ENABLE(EXPERIMENTAL_FEATURES). But I
> > agree that it should have a less bizarrely ambiguous name, if that is the
> > one you are talking about (it's the only one I can find). Wenson suggested
> > `MY_FEATURE` (you could also imagine `FEATURE_FOR_TESTING` or something).
> 
> Make sense. I like the `FEATURE_FOR_TESTING` for replacement. Also it should
> be better to change the title of this bug. How about "Change the confusing
> feature name for testing purpose"?

Sounds good to me!

[Basuke Suzuki]

Created attachment 440476 [details]
PATCH

[EWS]

Committed r283702 (242628@main): <https://commits.webkit.org/242628@main>

All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug and clearing flags on attachment 440476 [details].

[Radar WebKit Bug Importer]

<rdar://problem/83970509>