Summary: | REGRESSION(r268176): [GStreamer] media/video-orientation-canvas.html fails | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | Philippe Normand <pnormand> | ||||
Component: | Platform | Assignee: | Philippe Normand <pnormand> | ||||
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||||||
Severity: | Normal | CC: | calvaris, cgarcia, clopez, eric.carlson, ews-watchlist, glenn, gustavo, jer.noble, lmoura, menard, peng.liu6, philipj, sergio, vjaquez, webkit-bug-importer | ||||
Priority: | P2 | Keywords: | InRadar | ||||
Version: | WebKit Nightly Build | ||||||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
See Also: |
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95299 https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=224064 |
||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Philippe Normand
2021-03-28 02:52:32 PDT
Created attachment 424493 [details]
Patch
Comment on attachment 424493 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=424493&action=review > Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:9 > + handling of the image rotation tags is now performed only the pipeline is not able to do it Nit. s/only/only when/g. > Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/gstreamer/MediaPlayerPrivateGStreamer.cpp:2775 > + m_shouldHandleOrientationTags = true; Do we need to have a branch to set `m_shouldHandleOrientationTags` to false? Comment on attachment 424493 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=424493&action=review >> Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/gstreamer/MediaPlayerPrivateGStreamer.cpp:2775 >> + m_shouldHandleOrientationTags = true; > > Do we need to have a branch to set `m_shouldHandleOrientationTags` to false? No, the variable is initialized to false already and only one pipeline is created per MediaPlayerPrivate. *** Bug 224064 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** On r275376 I marked this test as failing, please remove the failed expectation once this lands. (In reply to Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez from comment #6) > BTW.. I think the regression was caused by r274076 and not by r268176 (as > the title implies) Oh? But r274076 is a change to Cocoa ports only. (In reply to Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez from comment #6) > BTW.. I think the regression was caused by r274076 and not by r268176 (as > the title implies) I found r268176 with results.webkit.org, though I admit I haven't tried a local revert to verify it. (In reply to Peng Liu from comment #7) > (In reply to Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez from comment #6) > > BTW.. I think the regression was caused by r274076 and not by r268176 (as > > the title implies) > > Oh? But r274076 is a change to Cocoa ports only. Ups.. yes. You're right. I got confused because r274076 showed as the first revision making this test fail on the bot result history. But that was just because r274076 removed this test as expected failure from LayoutTests/platform/wk2/TestExpectations So, ignore my comment. Sorry for the noise Comment on attachment 424493 [details]
Patch
Patch looks fine to me.
I have tested it works and fixes the test.
Please remove the expected failure from GTK TestExpectations file when landing it.
Committed r275412 (236075@main): <https://commits.webkit.org/236075@main> |