Bug 217899

Summary: Remove the CSSIndividualTransformPropertiesEnabled flag
Product: WebKit Reporter: Antoine Quint <graouts>
Component: CSSAssignee: Antoine Quint <graouts>
Status: NEW ---    
Severity: Normal CC: ahmad.saleem792, ap, bfulgham, dino, esprehn+autocc, ews-watchlist, glenn, graouts, gyuyoung.kim, joepeck, macpherson, menard, rniwa, sam, simon.fraser, webkit-bug-importer
Priority: P2 Keywords: InRadar
Version: WebKit Nightly Build   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Attachments:
Description Flags
Patch
none
Patch simon.fraser: review-, ews-feeder: commit-queue-

Description Antoine Quint 2020-10-19 03:21:26 PDT
Now that the default value for this flag is true, we should remove it altogether.
Comment 1 Radar WebKit Bug Importer 2020-10-19 03:21:52 PDT
<rdar://problem/70434096>
Comment 2 Antoine Quint 2020-10-19 04:46:40 PDT
Created attachment 411734 [details]
Patch
Comment 3 Simon Fraser (smfr) 2020-10-19 07:31:30 PDT
Comment on attachment 411734 [details]
Patch

Too soon. We need to be able to turn off for testing, to see what you broke.
Comment 4 Antoine Quint 2020-10-19 07:59:14 PDT
While I'm in no rush to land this, I want to point out that the changes that are actually guarded by that flag are not very risky compared to the GraphicsLayerCA changes that were related to supporting animation of those properties and which are not guarded by that flag (such as r268483).
Comment 5 Antoine Quint 2020-10-20 23:26:46 PDT
Created attachment 411962 [details]
Patch
Comment 6 Simon Fraser (smfr) 2020-10-21 10:50:59 PDT
Comment on attachment 411962 [details]
Patch

We leave flags around for a year for testing.
Comment 7 Sam Weinig 2020-10-21 15:07:29 PDT
(In reply to Simon Fraser (smfr) from comment #6)
> Comment on attachment 411962 [details]
> Patch
> 
> We leave flags around for a year for testing.

Thats not a policy I have heard before. It seems kinda reasonable, though I am a bit unclear its actually useful. If we are going to go with this, it would be nice to make this more official, and have some way of following up (since we have tons of flags that should be removed, but never have been). Can you propose a model for how we can ensure we revisit these after a year?