Bug 179822

Summary: [Service Workers] Implement "Notify Controller Change" algorithm
Product: WebKit Reporter: Chris Dumez <cdumez>
Component: WebCore Misc.Assignee: Chris Dumez <cdumez>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED    
Severity: Normal CC: beidson, commit-queue, ggaren, jlewis3, webkit-bug-importer, youennf
Priority: P2 Keywords: InRadar
Version: WebKit Nightly Build   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
See Also: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=180049
Attachments:
Description Flags
WIP Patch
none
Patch
none
Patch
none
Patch none

Chris Dumez
Reported 2017-11-17 09:03:00 PST
Implement "Notify Controller Change" algorithm: - https://w3c.github.io/ServiceWorker/#notify-controller-change
Attachments
WIP Patch (11.46 KB, patch)
2017-11-17 10:18 PST, Chris Dumez
no flags
Patch (17.74 KB, patch)
2017-11-17 10:47 PST, Chris Dumez
no flags
Patch (19.58 KB, patch)
2017-11-17 18:25 PST, Chris Dumez
no flags
Patch (19.53 KB, patch)
2017-11-17 18:28 PST, Chris Dumez
no flags
Chris Dumez
Comment 1 2017-11-17 10:18:47 PST
Created attachment 327193 [details] WIP Patch
Chris Dumez
Comment 2 2017-11-17 10:47:00 PST
youenn fablet
Comment 3 2017-11-17 16:22:21 PST
Comment on attachment 327194 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=327194&action=review > Source/WebCore/workers/service/ServiceWorkerContainer.cpp:419 > + scriptExecutionContext()->postTask([this, protectedThis = makeRef(*this)](ScriptExecutionContext&) mutable { I know the spec is written this way but It seems a bit weird to post a task here for dispatching an event. It does not seem observable to dispatch the event directly without the post task, at least in the current context it is used. Might be safer to stick to the spec though, not sure... > Source/WebCore/workers/service/ServiceWorkerContainer.cpp:424 > + dispatchEvent(controllerChangeEvent); do we need controllerChangeEvent variable? > Source/WebCore/workers/service/server/SWClientConnection.cpp:168 > +void SWClientConnection::notifyClientsOfControllerChange(const HashSet<uint64_t>& scriptExecutionContexts, const ServiceWorkerData& newController) newController can probably be an r value. > Source/WebCore/workers/service/server/SWClientConnection.cpp:177 > + client->setActiveServiceWorker(ServiceWorker::getOrCreate(*client, ServiceWorkerData { newController })); Maybe we should assert that client has an active service worker. Not sure whether we could also assert that we are actually changing from worker. > Source/WebCore/workers/service/server/SWServerJobQueue.cpp:235 > + // - Set clientâs active worker to registrationâs active worker. I see client^as here. > LayoutTests/http/tests/workers/service/controller-change.html:38 > + let frame = await withFrame(scopeURL); In sw-test-pre.js, there is an interceptedFrame function that could be reused to replace register and withFrame.
Chris Dumez
Comment 4 2017-11-17 18:25:26 PST
Chris Dumez
Comment 5 2017-11-17 18:28:57 PST
Chris Dumez
Comment 6 2017-11-17 19:42:23 PST
Comment on attachment 327294 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 327294 Committed r225011: <https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/225011>
Chris Dumez
Comment 7 2017-11-17 19:42:25 PST
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Radar WebKit Bug Importer
Comment 8 2017-11-17 19:43:26 PST
Matt Lewis
Comment 9 2017-11-27 12:41:16 PST
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.