Summary: | [EFL] Support an applicationVersion argument to UserAgentEfl::standardUserAgent() | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | Gyuyoung Kim <gyuyoung.kim> | ||||||
Component: | WebKit EFL | Assignee: | Gyuyoung Kim <gyuyoung.kim> | ||||||
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||||||||
Severity: | Normal | CC: | commit-queue, lucas.de.marchi | ||||||
Priority: | P2 | ||||||||
Version: | WebKit Nightly Build | ||||||||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Gyuyoung Kim
2015-11-09 16:33:45 PST
Created attachment 265116 [details]
Patch
Comment on attachment 265116 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=265116&action=review > Source/WebCore/platform/efl/UserAgentEfl.cpp:70 > + String finalApplicationVersion = applicationVersion; Should do early return if the application name is empty rather than computing an unused string. Probably easier to read than the ?: ternary. Comment on attachment 265116 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=265116&action=review >> Source/WebCore/platform/efl/UserAgentEfl.cpp:70 >> + String finalApplicationVersion = applicationVersion; > > Should do early return if the application name is empty rather than computing an unused string. Probably easier to read than the ?: ternary. Yes, right. It is more readable ! Created attachment 265258 [details]
Patch
Comment on attachment 265258 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 265258 Committed r192288: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/192288> All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug. |