Bug 148337 – Add a bunch of operators

• Component: New Bugs
• Status: RESOLVED FIXED

[Basile Clement]

jsc-tailcall: Add a bunch of operators

[Basile Clement]

Created attachment 259675 [details]
Patch

[Saam Barati]

Comment on attachment 259675 [details]
Patch

r=me

[Basile Clement]

Committed r188870 <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/188870>.

[Basile Clement]

(In reply to comment #3)
> Committed r188870 <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/188870>.

This was on the jsc-tailcall branch.

[Basile Clement]

Committed r189351: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/189351>

[Darin Adler]

Comment on attachment 259675 [details]
Patch

View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=259675&action=review

> Source/JavaScriptCore/jit/GPRInfo.h:71
> +    bool operator==(JSValueRegs other) { return m_gpr == other.m_gpr; }
> +    bool operator!=(JSValueRegs other) { return !(*this == other); }

Is more efficient code generated if we make the argument type be const JSValueRegs&?

> Source/JavaScriptCore/jit/GPRInfo.h:181
> +    bool operator==(JSValueRegs other) const

Same question.

> Source/JavaScriptCore/jit/GPRInfo.h:186
> +    bool operator!=(JSValueRegs other) const { return !(*this == other); }

Same question.

[Basile Clement]

(In reply to comment #6)
> Comment on attachment 259675 [details]
> Patch
> 
> View in context:
> https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=259675&action=review
> 
> > Source/JavaScriptCore/jit/GPRInfo.h:71
> > +    bool operator==(JSValueRegs other) { return m_gpr == other.m_gpr; }
> > +    bool operator!=(JSValueRegs other) { return !(*this == other); }
> 
> Is more efficient code generated if we make the argument type be const
> JSValueRegs&?
> 
> > Source/JavaScriptCore/jit/GPRInfo.h:181
> > +    bool operator==(JSValueRegs other) const
> 
> Same question.
> 
> > Source/JavaScriptCore/jit/GPRInfo.h:186
> > +    bool operator!=(JSValueRegs other) const { return !(*this == other); }
> 
> Same question.

JSValueRegs is an integer on 64 bit platforms, and two int8_t (thus packed as a single integer) on 32 bit platforms. So, passing by value is better here.

In practice, it probably doesn't matter at all since those functions will usually be inlined.