Summary: | Articles at Apple Support (docs.info.apple.com) have partially drawn borders | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | Charles Gaudette <charles> | ||||
Component: | Layout and Rendering | Assignee: | Nobody <webkit-unassigned> | ||||
Status: | RESOLVED WORKSFORME | ||||||
Severity: | Normal | CC: | ap, simon.fraser | ||||
Priority: | P2 | Keywords: | NeedsReduction | ||||
Version: | 523.x (Safari 3) | ||||||
Hardware: | Mac | ||||||
OS: | OS X 10.4 | ||||||
URL: | http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=304997 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Charles Gaudette
2007-07-19 16:54:56 PDT
Created attachment 15589 [details]
Screenshot
Confirmed with a local debug build of WebKit r24443 with Safari 3.0 (522.12) on Mac OS X 10.4.10 (8R218). I have semi-reduced this, but I'm holding at about 60 lines of HTML/CSS. I am now seeing this not as "-webkit" tricks, but as a few pixel-widths difference in how WebKit and others (like FF2) handle widths in the face of the HTML document declaring itself ``DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"´´. The above width difference combined with CSS — "background: url(...kbboxtop.gif) top left repeat-x;" — is creating the effects seen in the screenshot. The width difference might still be of interest, I'm going to continue to play with this for a few more days. The CSS repeat-x seems unnecessary, but is completely at the hands of Apple webmasters. (In reply to comment #3) > I have semi-reduced this, but I'm holding at about 60 lines of HTML/CSS. Attaching a partial reduction is still useful! I don't see this any more on the test URL. Without a testcase, this will have to be marked as WORKSFORME. Please feel free to re-open if you have a reduced test case, or another way to reproduce this. |