Summary: | Consolidate multiple OSRExit calls into one. | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | Nadav Rotem <nrotem> | ||||
Component: | New Bugs | Assignee: | Nobody <webkit-unassigned> | ||||
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||||||
Severity: | Normal | CC: | commit-queue, fpizlo, ggaren | ||||
Priority: | P2 | ||||||
Version: | 528+ (Nightly build) | ||||||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Nadav Rotem
2013-10-01 11:55:50 PDT
Created attachment 213105 [details]
Patch
Comment on attachment 213105 [details]
Patch
r=me.
should I cc commit-queue ? (In reply to comment #3) > should I cc commit-queue ? You can set 'cq' to '?', and then a committer can set cq+. I presume you want to commit so I will set cq+ for you. The convention is that if a patch is sitting without cq? then it shouldn't be landed, under the assumption that the patch author is still doing some additional tests. But if the patch author sets cq?, then any committer can set cq+ to auto-land it, or land it themselves. Comment on attachment 213105 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 213105 Committed r156734: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/156734> All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug. |