Bug 111657 – Don't give PageAllocationAligned the option to allocate executable memory

• Component: New Bugs
• Status: RESOLVED FIXED

[Oliver Hunt]

Don't give PageAllocationAligned the option to allocate executable memory

[Oliver Hunt]

Created attachment 191881 [details]
Patch

[Geoffrey Garen]

Comment on attachment 191881 [details]
Patch

r=me

[WebKit Review Bot]

Attachment 191881 [details] did not pass style-queue:

Failed to run "['Tools/Scripts/check-webkit-style', '--diff-files', u'Source/WTF/ChangeLog', u'Source/WTF/wtf/PageAllocationAligned.cpp', u'Source/WTF/wtf/PageAllocationAligned.h']" exit_code: 1
Source/WTF/wtf/PageAllocationAligned.h:44:  The parameter name "size" adds no information, so it should be removed.  [readability/parameter_name] [5]
Source/WTF/wtf/PageAllocationAligned.h:44:  The parameter name "usage" adds no information, so it should be removed.  [readability/parameter_name] [5]
Total errors found: 2 in 3 files


If any of these errors are false positives, please file a bug against check-webkit-style.

[Oliver Hunt]

Committed r145018: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/145018>

[Julien Chaffraix]

This change broke all the builds (because non Mac platforms used the boolean) but you never saw that because you didn't run the EWS. There is a patch to fix it in bug 111659.

But it also broke Apple Win on top of it as the WTF exported symbol changed.

Unless you fix this within 30 minutes, I will have to roll this change out.

[Julien Chaffraix]

> But it also broke Apple Win on top of it as the WTF exported symbol changed.
> 
> Unless you fix this within 30 minutes, I will have to roll this change out.

Actually scratch that, Ryosuke corrected me. It will be corrected by bug 111659. Thanks for wasting everybody's time.

[Oliver Hunt]

(In reply to comment #6)
> > But it also broke Apple Win on top of it as the WTF exported symbol changed.
> > 
> > Unless you fix this within 30 minutes, I will have to roll this change out.
> 
> Actually scratch that, Ryosuke corrected me. It will be corrected by bug 111659. Thanks for wasting everybody's time.

That's the one of least professional comments i've seen yet.  Obviously I did not deliberately break other builds (i thought i had removed the use of the executable parameter for other builds).