WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
9213
Absolutely positioned objects with relatively positioned inline containing blocks are rendered incorrectly
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9213
Summary
Absolutely positioned objects with relatively positioned inline containing bl...
Sam Weinig
Reported
2006-06-01 11:51:38 PDT
CSS 2.1 specifies that an absolutely positioned object may have a relatively positioned inline element as its containing block, but in such cases the equation for determining the bounds change from the ordanary. Currently no browsers that I have tested fully implement the specified behavior.
Attachments
patch
(22.57 KB, patch)
2006-06-01 12:01 PDT
,
Sam Weinig
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
patch 2
(22.58 KB, patch)
2006-06-03 14:23 PDT
,
Sam Weinig
hyatt
: review+
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(1)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Sam Weinig
Comment 1
2006-06-01 12:01:43 PDT
Created
attachment 8648
[details]
patch
Dave Hyatt
Comment 2
2006-06-02 02:10:37 PDT
Typo in the comments in two places: "relativly" should be "relatively" Should we be worried about the fact that this doesn't match other browsers?
Joost de Valk (AlthA)
Comment 3
2006-06-02 02:14:32 PDT
I think we should.
Sam Weinig
Comment 4
2006-06-02 13:34:10 PDT
I would be happy to make a quirks mode variation, but I am really unsure what we want to emulate from the other browsers. Our current behavior does not match either Firefox or Opera (the only two I have access to), and I am not sure what we would want to mimic. I will of course fix the typos, but I would also love to know what a desired quirks mode behavior would be.
Sam Weinig
Comment 5
2006-06-03 14:23:43 PDT
Created
attachment 8683
[details]
patch 2 Fixes the misspellings.
Dave Hyatt
Comment 6
2006-06-04 11:53:22 PDT
Comment on
attachment 8683
[details]
patch 2 r=me
David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
Comment 7
2006-06-04 14:57:15 PDT
(In reply to
comment #6
)
> (From update of
attachment 8683
[details]
[edit]) > r=me
There were no *-expected.txt results in this patch. In the future, it would be helpful to have these test results included in the patch to make sure a local build is working properly before commit. Thanks!
David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
Comment 8
2006-06-04 15:36:54 PDT
Committed revision 14727.
mitz
Comment 9
2006-12-16 12:48:48 PST
***
Bug 5722
has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug