Bug 9100 - Absolutely positioned replaced elements with all non-auto values are rendered incorrectly
Summary: Absolutely positioned replaced elements with all non-auto values are rendered...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: WebKit
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Layout and Rendering (show other bugs)
Version: 420+
Hardware: Mac OS X 10.4
: P1 Normal
Assignee: Nobody
URL:
Keywords: Regression
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-05-24 15:34 PDT by Sam Weinig
Modified: 2006-05-31 23:11 PDT (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
test case of the horizontal (509 bytes, text/html)
2006-05-24 15:42 PDT, Sam Weinig 		no flags Details
test case of the vertical (507 bytes, text/html)
2006-05-24 15:43 PDT, Sam Weinig 		no flags Details
patch (4.60 KB, patch)
2006-05-25 07:59 PDT, Sam Weinig 		hyatt: review+
Details | Formatted Diff | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Sam Weinig 2006-05-24 15:34:14 PDT 
In a regression from the shipping Safari, if an absolutly posioned replaced object (i.e. and image) has top, bottom, margin-top, margin-bottom with all values other than auto (the same is true for the horizontal equivilants), it ends up giving incorrect rendering by making top and bottom go to 0.
Comment 1 Sam Weinig 2006-05-24 15:42:52 PDT 
Created attachment 8523 [details]
test case of the horizontal
Comment 2 Sam Weinig 2006-05-24 15:43:21 PDT 
Created attachment 8524 [details]
test case of the vertical
Comment 3 Sam Weinig 2006-05-24 15:50:18 PDT 
The patch for this is pretty trivial but it will be much easier once bug 9085 is finished an landed.
Comment 4 Sam Weinig 2006-05-25 07:59:22 PDT 
Created attachment 8539 [details]
patch

Scratch the last comment.  I fixed the patch for bug 9085 to not interfere and was therefore able to make this patch.  It very simply adds an else clause to cover the case when all the values are not auto.
Comment 5 Dave Hyatt 2006-05-29 23:03:52 PDT 
Comment on attachment 8539 [details]
patch

r=me