WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
6895
include exception names in JavaScript form of DOM exception
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6895
Summary
include exception names in JavaScript form of DOM exception
Darin Adler
Reported
2006-01-28 18:21:28 PST
We should include the exception names in the JavaScript exceptions created for DOM exceptions. This will make the JavaScript console much nicer for cases where it's reporting a DOM exception.
Attachments
include exception name in message in JavaScript exception object
(3.72 KB, patch)
2006-01-28 18:23 PST
,
Darin Adler
mjs
: review+
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Darin Adler
Comment 1
2006-01-28 18:23:26 PST
Created
attachment 6058
[details]
include exception name in message in JavaScript exception object
Maciej Stachowiak
Comment 2
2006-01-28 19:43:29 PST
Comment on
attachment 6058
[details]
include exception name in message in JavaScript exception object r=me Should we consider adding human readable messages to the exception as well?
Darin Adler
Comment 3
2006-01-28 20:27:07 PST
Yes, I was thinking that would be a nice next step.
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 4
2006-01-29 02:07:00 PST
Shouldn't rangeExceptionNames should also start with a zero, like exceptionNames? +static const char * const rangeExceptionNames[] = { + "BAD_BOUNDARYPOINTS_ERR", "INVALID_NODE_TYPE_ERR" +}; There is an extra semicolon in one line: + int nameTableSize;; There already was a bug requesting such an improvement (
bug 6745
) - should it be marked as a duplicate now, or can rather be used to tracking further enchancements?
Darin Adler
Comment 5
2006-01-29 08:56:36 PST
(In reply to
comment #4
)
> Shouldn't rangeExceptionNames should also start with a zero, like > exceptionNames? > +static const char * const rangeExceptionNames[] = { > + "BAD_BOUNDARYPOINTS_ERR", "INVALID_NODE_TYPE_ERR" > +};
Yes, good catch!
> There already was a bug requesting such an improvement (
bug 6745
) - should it > be marked as a duplicate now, or can rather be used to tracking further > enchancements?
I think we should use that one to track further enhancement.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug