WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
VERIFIED FIXED
3295
cellIndex is always zero
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3295
Summary
cellIndex is always zero
Jonathan Hurshman
Reported
2005-06-07 05:54:57 PDT
The cellIndex property of TD nodes is always 0, regardless of the actual position of the cell in the row.
Attachments
A testcase for this bug
(675 bytes, text/html)
2005-06-07 05:57 PDT
,
Jonathan Hurshman
no flags
Details
Proposed patch
(2.52 KB, patch)
2005-06-17 13:42 PDT
,
Justin Garcia
hyatt
: review+
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Proposed patch with better coding style :-)
(2.52 KB, patch)
2005-06-17 14:30 PDT
,
Justin Garcia
hyatt
: review+
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Remove outdated commnet
(522 bytes, patch)
2005-06-18 03:02 PDT
,
Harri Porten
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Remove outdated comment
(522 bytes, patch)
2005-06-18 03:02 PDT
,
Harri Porten
darin
: review+
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(2)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Jonathan Hurshman
Comment 1
2005-06-07 05:57:27 PDT
Created
attachment 2128
[details]
A testcase for this bug
Jonathan Hurshman
Comment 2
2005-06-07 06:14:28 PDT
(This bug was copied from Apple's Bug Reporter #3756860)
Allan Sandfeld Jensen
Comment 3
2005-06-13 03:47:53 PDT
Fixed in Konqueror
Maks Orlovich
Comment 4
2005-06-16 20:01:32 PDT
FYI,
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58799#c7
and
http://websvn.kde.org/*checkout*/trunk/tests/khtmltests/regression/tests/unsorted/58799.html?rev=426346
. Previously it wasn't quite right.
Justin Garcia
Comment 5
2005-06-17 13:42:32 PDT
Created
attachment 2448
[details]
Proposed patch
Dave Hyatt
Comment 6
2005-06-17 14:09:36 PDT
+ const NodeImpl * node = this; + int index = 0; + do { + node = node->previousSibling(); + if(node && (node->id() == ID_TD || node->id() == ID_TH)) + index++; + } while(node); for (const NodeImpl* node = node->previousSibling(); node; node = node->previousSibling()) if (node->id() == ID_TH || node->id() == ID_TH) index++; ... reads better to me then a do construct that still ends up null-checking.
Dave Hyatt
Comment 7
2005-06-17 14:10:09 PDT
+ const NodeImpl * node = this; + int index = 0; + do { + node = node->previousSibling(); + if(node && (node->id() == ID_TD || node->id() == ID_TH)) + index++; + } while(node); for (const NodeImpl* node = node->previousSibling(); node; node = node->previousSibling()) { if (node->id() == ID_TD || node->id() == ID_TH) index++; } ... reads better to me then a do construct that still ends up null-checking.
Dave Hyatt
Comment 8
2005-06-17 14:10:59 PDT
node = previousSibling(). Yes, I can write code. Really. ;)
Dave Hyatt
Comment 9
2005-06-17 14:14:40 PDT
Comment on
attachment 2448
[details]
Proposed patch r=me, would prefer for loop, but don't really feel strongly. :)
Justin Garcia
Comment 10
2005-06-17 14:30:42 PDT
Created
attachment 2449
[details]
Proposed patch with better coding style :-)
Dave Hyatt
Comment 11
2005-06-17 14:34:53 PDT
Comment on
attachment 2449
[details]
Proposed patch with better coding style :-) r=me, fix the 8-space indentation to be 4-space though.
Harri Porten
Comment 12
2005-06-18 03:02:43 PDT
Created
attachment 2456
[details]
Remove outdated commnet I don't think the comment is valid anymore.
Harri Porten
Comment 13
2005-06-18 03:02:47 PDT
Created
attachment 2457
[details]
Remove outdated comment I don't think the comment is valid anymore.
Darin Adler
Comment 14
2005-06-18 21:02:17 PDT
Patch looks good, and since Justin has commit privileges I'm not going to land it for him. Justin, you should commit this!
Darin Adler
Comment 15
2005-06-19 11:57:24 PDT
The for loop idiom is pretty nice, nicer than the original do/while. There's also a good while idiom for this sort of thing that you can see in functions like HTMLOptionElementImpl::text.
Anders Carlsson
Comment 16
2005-06-24 08:16:13 PDT
***
Bug 3623
has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Joost de Valk (AlthA)
Comment 17
2005-07-13 23:05:31 PDT
Fixed in 10.4.2
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug